2011
DOI: 10.3390/f2030707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Simulation Modelling of Future Forest Cover Change Scenarios in Luangprabang Province, Lao PDR

Abstract: Taking Luangprabang province in Lao Peoples's Democratic Republic (PDR) as an example, we simulated future forest cover changes under the business-as-usual (BAU), pessimistic and optimistic scenarios based on the Markov-cellular automata (MCA) model. We computed transition probabilities from satellite-derived forest cover maps (1993 and 2000) using the Markov chains, while the "weights of evidence" technique was used to generate transition potential maps. The initial forest cover map (1993), the transition p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In County Centre in Pennsylvania, the rate of forest loss at county level from 1993 to 2000 was 0.07% per year (140 ha/year), whilst the rate of forest gain was around 0.12% per year (248 ha/year), giving a net conversion rate to forest of 0.05% per year (109 ha/year) [23]. In Lao PDR, the rate of "current forest" loss from 1993 to 2007 was 2.4% per year (437,400 ha/year), whilst the rate of "current forest" gain was 0.7% per year (129,800 ha/year), giving a net conversion rate from "current forest" of 1.7% per year (307,600 ha/year) [61]. Based on the net change, the rate of primary forest loss in Tam Dao National Park in Vietnam from 1993 to 2007 was 2.4% per year (912 ha/year) [20], whilst the rate of forest loss in Kathmandu valley in Nepal from 1978 to 2000 was around 1% per year (137 ha/year) [24].…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In County Centre in Pennsylvania, the rate of forest loss at county level from 1993 to 2000 was 0.07% per year (140 ha/year), whilst the rate of forest gain was around 0.12% per year (248 ha/year), giving a net conversion rate to forest of 0.05% per year (109 ha/year) [23]. In Lao PDR, the rate of "current forest" loss from 1993 to 2007 was 2.4% per year (437,400 ha/year), whilst the rate of "current forest" gain was 0.7% per year (129,800 ha/year), giving a net conversion rate from "current forest" of 1.7% per year (307,600 ha/year) [61]. Based on the net change, the rate of primary forest loss in Tam Dao National Park in Vietnam from 1993 to 2007 was 2.4% per year (912 ha/year) [20], whilst the rate of forest loss in Kathmandu valley in Nepal from 1978 to 2000 was around 1% per year (137 ha/year) [24].…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of land cover classes ranges from three to nine with an average of six. Those that used an unsupervised classification method [27,31,61] have an overall accuracy ranging from 85% to 90% with an average overall accuracy of 88%, and the number of land cover classes ranges from three to eight with an average of six. In this study, the number of land cover classes (4) influenced the accuracy of the land cover maps, rendering relatively high classification accuracy.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolfram (1983) refers to nearly 50 papers related to applications of cellular automata, indicating the model's accuracy and reliabi lity. Soares-Filho et al (2006) used a similar approach for modelling deforestation trends in the Amazon basin, as Geri et al (2011), Kamusoko et al (2011), Maeda et al (2011) and Farfán (2012 did in their studies of land cover change including deforestation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several tools have been developed and used since the 1990s to simulate forest-clearing dynamics and to predict which areas are subject to the risk of losing carbon due to deforestation [14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, limited data availability can hamper their use in some developing countries [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%