2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling, simulation and optimization of a no-chamber solid oxide fuel cell operated with a flat-flame burner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coking is also influenced by fuel type, for example a cell operated in direct methanol flame showed stable performance over 30 h, whereas a similar cell operated with ethanol flame failed very quickly due to carbon deposition on the anode [8]. Direct-flame SOFCs have been operated with a wide variety of burner configurations, including jet burner tube which provides a simple setup and stable flame [19], micro-jet flame [7], multi-element diffusion flame burner [16], and flat flame burner [28] which provides very uniform temperature and concentration distributions across the cell area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coking is also influenced by fuel type, for example a cell operated in direct methanol flame showed stable performance over 30 h, whereas a similar cell operated with ethanol flame failed very quickly due to carbon deposition on the anode [8]. Direct-flame SOFCs have been operated with a wide variety of burner configurations, including jet burner tube which provides a simple setup and stable flame [19], micro-jet flame [7], multi-element diffusion flame burner [16], and flat flame burner [28] which provides very uniform temperature and concentration distributions across the cell area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a significant challenge in a dual chamber configuration in which the fuel cells are sealed to create separate fuel and oxidant chambers (Milcarek et al, 2016e;Milcarek et al, 2016f). To avoid the sealing challenges a single chamber configuration (Priestnall et al, 2002;Raz et al, 2002;Riess 2008;Riess et al, 1995) and a no-chamber, Direct Flame Fuel Cell (DFFC) (Endo and Nakamura 2014;Horiuchi et al, 2004;Kronemayer et al, 2007;Sun et al, 2010;Vogler et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2014b;Wang et al, 2013;Yu-guang Wang et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2014a;Zhu et al 2012), have been proposed. While the DFFC configuration can perform rapid startup and thermal cycling, challenges persist with low fuel utilization, electrical efficiency, and thermal stresses due to an uneven temperature distribution of the flame over the fuel cell surface (Wang et al, 2015(Wang et al, , 2011Wang et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a radiation correction has been performed, there is still some uncertainty in the absolute values, as is generally the case with thermocouple measurement of flame temperature. Flame simulations and modeling were studied by Horiuchi and Kronemayer et al (5,13,16) to calculate equilibrium gas compositions and adiabatic flame temperature of methane/air flames using Cantera thermodynamic simulation software (15). A similar approach was followed in this study to calculate the equilibrium gas compositions and adiabatic flame temperature of ethylene/air flames for φ = 0.5 -2.4, and to identify the fuel species available for the SOFC in the combustion product mixture.…”
Section: Flame Temperature and Gas Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling and simulation techniques were also studied to identify and reduce the efficiency losses and improving the DFFC performance (13). Despite various studies in DFFCs, a range of technical challenges still remain to be resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%