2012
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2012.57.3.0881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling sinking rate of zooplankton carcasses: Effects of stratification and mixing

Abstract: Using the carcass sinking rate and density determined in laboratory for several freshwater zooplankton species, we developed a model of zooplankton carcass sinking as affected by turbulence and stratification. The model was subsequently used to estimate the residence time of zooplankton carcasses in the water column of Lake Stechlin, a typical temperate dimictic lake in northeastern Germany. The residence time varied among the different species and was strongly affected by thermal stratification. At the peak o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirect estimations from sediment traps provide instead varying results with a speed as low as 1.7 m d −1 for freshwater zooplankton carcasses (Dubovskaya et al ) and up to 500 m d −1 for marine snow (Asper ; Peterson et al ; Trull et al ; Armstrong et al ; Xue and Armstrong ). However, numerical simulations by Kirillin et al () for zooplankton carcasses 1 mm in size revealed a sinking rate of [38–100] m d −1 , which is in the same range as those measured with our 3D‐PTV system.…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indirect estimations from sediment traps provide instead varying results with a speed as low as 1.7 m d −1 for freshwater zooplankton carcasses (Dubovskaya et al ) and up to 500 m d −1 for marine snow (Asper ; Peterson et al ; Trull et al ; Armstrong et al ; Xue and Armstrong ). However, numerical simulations by Kirillin et al () for zooplankton carcasses 1 mm in size revealed a sinking rate of [38–100] m d −1 , which is in the same range as those measured with our 3D‐PTV system.…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…c shows that ρ P varied between 999 and 1013 kg m −3 , with an average of 1002 kg m −3 . These values were smaller than in vitro estimations of zooplankton carcasses by Kirillin et al () and Simoncelli et al (), but the excess density ρ P − ρ W was in agreement with in situ measurements of marine snow (Alldredge and Gotschalk ).…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The spreading mechanism here is important for the link to habitat: Chaoborus can disperse yeast spores into the epilimnion where both the host (Threlkeld 1979) and Chaoborus (von Ende 1979) migrate at night. These spores can remain suspended and contact new hosts; otherwise, hosts dying from infection likely would sink to the lake bottom before spores escaped (Cá ceres et al 2009;Johnson et al 2009;Kirillin et al 2012). But why did lakes with stronger stratification have greater density of Chaoborus?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 3 10 23 m 2 s 21 for Lake Stechlin (Kirillin et al 2012). We also estimated the diffusive loss at the water surface using the boundary layer equation:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%