Modeling snowline locations in protostars: The impact of the structure of protostellar cloud cores

Abstract

Context. Snowlines during star and disk formation are responsible for a range of effects during the evolution of protostars, such as setting the chemical composition of the envelope and disk. This in turn influences the formation of planets by changing the elemental compositions of solids and affecting the collisional properties and outcomes of dust grains. Snowlines can also reveal echoes of past accretion bursts, providing insight into the formation process of stars. Aims. The objective is to identify which parameters (e.g., luminosity, gas density, and presence of disk) dictate the location of snowlines during the early, deeply embedded phase and to quantify how each parameter changes the observed snowline location. Methods. A numerical chemical network coupled with a grid of cylindrical-symmetric physical models was used to identify what physical parameters alter the CO and H 2 O snowline locations. The investigated parameters are the initial molecular abundances, binding energies of CO and H 2 O, heating source, cloud core density, outflow cavity opening angle, and disk geometry. Simulated molecular line emission maps were used to quantify the change in the snowline location with each parameter. Results. The snowline radius of molecules with low sublimation temperatures ( 30 K), such as CO, shift outward on the order of 10 3 AU with an order of magnitude increase in protostellar luminosity. An order of magnitude decrease in cloud core density also shifts the CO snowline position outward by a few 10 3 AU. The presence of disk(-like) structures cause inward shifts by a factor of a few, and mainly along the disk mid-plane. For molecules that sublimate at higher temperatures, such as H 2 O, increasing the protostellar luminosity or decreasing the cloud core density by an order of magnitude shifts the snowline position outward by a factor of a few. The presence of a disk concentrates molecules with high sublimation temperatures to compact regions (a few 10 AU) around the protostar by limiting the outward shift of snowline positions. Successful observational measurements of snowline locations are strongly dependent on spatial resolution, the presence or lack thereof of disk(-like) structures, and the inclination of the disk(-like) structure. Conclusions. The CO and H 2 O snowline locations do not occur at a single, well-defined temperature as is commonly assumed. Instead, the snowline position depends on luminosity, cloud core density, and whether a disk is present or not. Inclination and spatial resolution affect the observability and successful measurement of snowline locations. We note that N 2 H + and HCO + emission serve as good observational tracers of CO and H 2 O snowline locations. However, constraints on whether or not a disk is present, the observation of additional molecular tracers, and estimating envelope density will help in accurately determining the cause of the observed snowline position. Plots of the N 2 H + and HCO + peak emission radius versus luminosity are provided to compare the models with...

Multiple Jets in the Bursting Protostar HOPS 373SW

“…Thus, the current CO emission is a factor of 2.6 more extended than that expected from the current luminosity. In addition, the peak of the N 2 D + is 6 3-7 4 off from the center of HOPS 373SW, implying the luminosity during a past burst reached ∼40-60 L e (Hsieh et al 2019;Murillo et al 2022).…”

Shaping the CO snowline in protoplanetary disks

“…The opacities are commonly averaged over a typical dust size distribution from the MRN model, and the maximum grain size is chosen to align with multiwavelength observations. More precisely, most recent studies considered a dust model composed of two grain populations: a small dust population, and a large dust population (e.g., Du & Bergin 2014;Ballering et al 2021;Schwarz et al 2021;Zhang et al 2021;Murillo et al 2022). They were meant to fit observationally constrained evidence of grain growth and size dependence to vertical and radial segregation (Gräfe et al 2013;Pérez et al 2015;Tazzari et al 2016;Villenave et al 2020).…”