2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11002-008-9048-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications

Abstract: Social interactions, Networking, Social multiplier, Peer effects,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, to control for simultaneity, in accordance with Hartmann et al (2008), we use an exclusion restriction that imposes a temporal ordering i.e., the focal individual's behavior in time t is affected by the social network behavior up to time t-1. That is, we use the lagged social network variable in accordance with Manski (1993) and other work that has studied the impact of the social network effect on user behavior (Van den Bulte and Lilien 2001, Iyengar et al 2010 Lagging avoids the simultaneity problem, unless (1) people are forward-looking not only about their own behavior but also that of others and (2) social ties over which influence flows are symmetric (Hartmann et al 2008, Iyengar et al 2010.…”
Section: Identification Of the Social Network Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, to control for simultaneity, in accordance with Hartmann et al (2008), we use an exclusion restriction that imposes a temporal ordering i.e., the focal individual's behavior in time t is affected by the social network behavior up to time t-1. That is, we use the lagged social network variable in accordance with Manski (1993) and other work that has studied the impact of the social network effect on user behavior (Van den Bulte and Lilien 2001, Iyengar et al 2010 Lagging avoids the simultaneity problem, unless (1) people are forward-looking not only about their own behavior but also that of others and (2) social ties over which influence flows are symmetric (Hartmann et al 2008, Iyengar et al 2010.…”
Section: Identification Of the Social Network Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, we use the lagged social network variable in accordance with Manski (1993) and other work that has studied the impact of the social network effect on user behavior (Van den Bulte and Lilien 2001, Iyengar et al 2010 Lagging avoids the simultaneity problem, unless (1) people are forward-looking not only about their own behavior but also that of others and (2) social ties over which influence flows are symmetric (Hartmann et al 2008, Iyengar et al 2010. The first condition is quite unlikely in large networks such as ours, and the second condition does not hold in our data.…”
Section: Identification Of the Social Network Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van der Merwe [11] described its effect on the role of opinion leaders. According to various authors [13,14], both opinion spreading and speed of innovation adoption depend on the considered network structure and density. Second, the interest of adopting a non-local approach is backed by several Marketing studies like [15], which, following a stream of Sociology studies, emphasized the necessity of taking sub-networks or cliques into account.…”
Section: Network Analysis In Business Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless we have more detailed information about how frequently the consumers update their estimate of installed base, the choice of perception lag will be ad hoc and in practice determined by the frequency of data. Another problem, pointed out by Hartmann et al (2008) in relation to the Bass (1969) model, is that the relationship between the installed base and current network might be driven by serial correlation in sales-related unobservables over time. We address these concerns in the empirical section of the paper by comparing the estimated model using various perception lags.…”
Section: Functional Specification and Identification Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%