2004
DOI: 10.2172/885635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Soil Quality Thresholds to Ecosystem Recovery at Fort Benning, Georgia, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil sampling in old fields and abandoned agricultural land in the southeastern USA [29,30] indicates that a default value for BSC would range from 2.5 to 3.5 g C m −2 and FNF is about 0.2. Therefore, initial conditions for the soil carbon stock in the model were set to 3.0 kg C m −2 .…”
Section: Soil Carbon Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soil sampling in old fields and abandoned agricultural land in the southeastern USA [29,30] indicates that a default value for BSC would range from 2.5 to 3.5 g C m −2 and FNF is about 0.2. Therefore, initial conditions for the soil carbon stock in the model were set to 3.0 kg C m −2 .…”
Section: Soil Carbon Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combinations of high mean annual temperatures and high initial soil carbon stocks (>5 kg C m −2 ) are improbable initial conditions for switchgrass establishment in the southeastern USA. Measurements at various locations throughout the region indicate that surface (0-30 cm) soil carbon stocks in abandoned agricultural fields seldom exceed 4 kg C m −2 [29,30,50]. Lands in the conservation reserve program in three states were also found to contain less than 4 kg C m −2 to a depth of 30 cm [51].…”
Section: Model-based Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this growth rate, predicted tree wood biomass reached 94% of steady state in E50 years. Maximum aboveground tree biomass (TARGET) was set to 18,000 g m À2 which is in agreement with estimates of aboveground biomass in longleaf pine stands at Fort Benning (Garten and Ashwood, 2005) and with stand biomass in mature (45-year old) forests on the southern Piedmont (Johnson and Lindberg, 1992). This is similar to aboveground biomass in loblolly pine after 50-60 years of stand development (E21,000 g m À2 ; Switzer et al, 1968).…”
Section: Tree Biomass Submodelmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The model was parameterized using information from field studies (Garten and Ashwood, 2004;Garten and Ashwood, 2005), literature sources, and parameter fitting. Prior research on Fort Benning (Garten and Ashwood, 2005) indicated that soils with varying sand content had different predicted thresholds to ecosystem recovery.…”
Section: Model Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation