2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted effects of prescribed burning and harvesting on forest recovery and sustainability in southwest Georgia, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also suggest that forest fire managers should pay particular attention to the respective thresholds of each fuel type when carrying out a prescribed burn. Information from this laboratory experiment should provide fire managers in northeast China greater understanding of the requirements of prescribed burning and the level of good-practice guidelines, allowing them to adjust management to meet the criteria (Charles and Garten 2006;Wang et al 2013). This will contribute to the preservation of both biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services (Allen et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results also suggest that forest fire managers should pay particular attention to the respective thresholds of each fuel type when carrying out a prescribed burn. Information from this laboratory experiment should provide fire managers in northeast China greater understanding of the requirements of prescribed burning and the level of good-practice guidelines, allowing them to adjust management to meet the criteria (Charles and Garten 2006;Wang et al 2013). This will contribute to the preservation of both biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services (Allen et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fort Benning uses prescribed burning to remove understory vegetation on almost approximately 3鈥恲ear fire return interval. There are minor predicted effects of prescribed burning on forest recovery or sustainability (Garten 2006) as well as measured minor effects on soil A鈥恏orizon depth and the composition of understory vegetation (Dilustro et al 2006). However, an analysis of a subset of sites indicated no difference among land use categories with respect to years since the last burn ( p = 0.67, one鈥恮ay analysis of variance; reference forests = 2.3 years, n = 12; reforested = 1.9 years, n = 13, and disturbed = 1.8 years, n = 13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Garten (2006) used a simple compartment model to predict the effects of prescribed burning at Fort Benning without considering biological nitrogen input, such as symbiotic and nonsymbiotic N 2 fixation; this could lead to significant biases both in scientific research and land management decisions since biological N 2 fixation may play an important role in replenishing N loss from fire.…”
Section: Impacts Of Cyclic Prescribed Fire On Ecosystem C and N Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we simulated C and N cycles at relatively infertile longleaf pine sites at Fort Benning. Key model parameters, including C: N ratios of plant tissues, soil, atmospheric N deposition rate, symbiotic and nonsymbiotic N 2 fixation, and C allocations among plant parts were either measured from previous studies (DeBusk et al, 2005;Garten and Ashwood, 2004a) or taken from literature review (DiStefano and Gholz, 1989;Hendricks and Boring, 1999;Lajeunesse et al;2006). Meteorological data (monthly precipitation and temperature) were from on-installation weather stations.…”
Section: Figure 14 Major C and N Cycling Processes And Pools In The mentioning
confidence: 99%