Modeling Spin-Crossover Dynamics

Abstract

In this article, we review nonadiabatic molecular dynamics (NAMD) methods for modeling spin-crossover transitions. First, we discuss different representations of electronic states employed in the grid-based and direct NAMD simulations. The nature of interstate couplings in different representations is highlighted, with the main focus on nonadiabatic and spin-orbit couplings. Second, we describe three NAMD methods that have been used to simulate spin-crossover dynamics, including trajectory surface hopping, ab initio multiple spawning, and multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree. Some aspects of employing different electronic structure methods to obtain information about potential energy surfaces and interstate couplings for NAMD simulations are also discussed. Third, representative applications of NAMD to spin crossovers in molecular systems of different sizes and complexities are highlighted. Finally, we pose several fundamental questions related to spin-dependent processes. These questions should be possible to address with future methodological developments in NAMD. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, Volume 72 is April 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Spin Crossover of Thiophosgene via Multidimensional Heavy-Atom Quantum Tunneling

“…In principle, one could attempt to simulate spin crossovers with nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. , However, the high computational costs for running the simulations limits their applicability to very fast reactions on the femtosecond and picosecond time scales, especially because the high sensitivity of reaction rates with respect to the potential-energy surface (PES) usually warrants expensive high-level electronic-structure methods. More importantly, many dynamics methods make use of classical trajectories and neglect quantum tunneling.…”

Intersystem Crossings in Late-Row Elements: A Perspective

“…The second family, dynamic methods, aims to estimate ISC rates by explicitly simulating the transition using nonadiabatic dynamics. 23 As electronic transitions in the absence of a timedependent external perturbation are driven by the motion of nuclei, nonadiabatic methods differ in how they choose to sample the time-dependent nuclear wave function. Partially quantum mechanical approaches include multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) 24 and path integral molecular dynamics (PIMD) 25 methods, though these are computationally prohibitive for larger systems.…”

Modeling Spin-Dependent Nonadiabatic Dynamics with Electronic Degeneracy: A Phase-Space Surface-Hopping Method

“…For instance, recent water (H 2 O) splitting experiments have shown that if one can produce OH radicals of the same spin then one can effectively block H 2 O 2 production and increase the yield of H 2 and O 2 . Currently, there are a wide range of mixed quantum-classical (MQC) methods − such as mean-field Ehrenfest dynamics (MFE), , fewest-switches surface hopping (FSSH), − and ab initio multiple spawning (AIMS) for efficiently modeling ab initio nonadiabatic dynamics with reasonable accuracy, and many of these methods have been extended in principle to models of spin-crossover dynamics. − However, there are clear limitations to what physics these algorithms can capture. In particular, none of the algorithms above can model the effects of Berry curvature (and Berry force) in full generality …”