2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1991452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Spot Price Dependence in Australian Electricity Markets with Applications to Risk Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower tail dependence was estimated non-parametrically, while the dependence specification was estimated using the canonical maximum likelihood method [43]. Ignatieva and Truck [44] analyzed the dependence structure in the electricity markets using different copula models and found the Student t copula provided better dependence structure modeling accuracy and VaR estimation accuracy [44]. Boubaker and Sghaier [45] identifies the long memory feature in the financial returns dependence structure captured using the copula model.…”
Section: Copula Model In the Energy Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower tail dependence was estimated non-parametrically, while the dependence specification was estimated using the canonical maximum likelihood method [43]. Ignatieva and Truck [44] analyzed the dependence structure in the electricity markets using different copula models and found the Student t copula provided better dependence structure modeling accuracy and VaR estimation accuracy [44]. Boubaker and Sghaier [45] identifies the long memory feature in the financial returns dependence structure captured using the copula model.…”
Section: Copula Model In the Energy Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they note (at p. 384) " if spare import capacity is (not) available, [price] spikes should be smaller (larger) in size as generation capacity from the nearby region can (cannot) be transmitted to meet the local demand." Prior research on electricity price linkages and information transmission in the NEM has identified the existence of spillovers of volatility (or second moment) risk (e.g., Apergis et al, 2017a;Han et al, 2017;Ignatieva and Truck, 2016;Higgs, 2009;Worthington et al, 2005;Higgs and Worthington, 2005). However, focusing on volatility alone ignores that the distribution of electricity prices is skewed and heavily tailed and what this implies for risks due to transmission of extreme events in terms of their magnitude (via skewness spillover) and the likelihood of their occurrence (via kurtosis spillover).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of focusing on higher moment channels, and not just volatility risk, is that higher moment risks contain more predictive information about underlying network constraints and future evolution of electricity market prices, given that regional energy markets exhibit significant tail dependence and asymmetries (Ignatieva and Truck, 2016). For instance, the fatter the tail, the greater the probability of obtaining price changes that are extreme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using futures prices instead of spot prices does not only allow us to take a forward-looking approach, but is also less sensitive to short-term events in electricity spot markets, such as extreme price spikes (Weron, 2006). This is of particular importance for the Australian NEM, where regional markets have been characterized as being among the most volatile and spikeprone in the world (Janczura et al, 2013;Clements et al, 2015;Ignatieva and Trück, 2016). Using futures instead of spot electricity prices, we also do not require detailed information on the actual fuel mix for the generation of electricity at each point in time to determine carbon pass-through rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%