2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2020.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling statistical dependencies in multi-region spike train data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach can also be extended in several ways to make it more useful to the neuroscience community. For example, replacing the spike count-based noise models with a point process model would provide higher temporal resolution (Duncker and Sahani, 2018), and facilitate inference of optimal temporal delays across neural populations (Lakshmanan et al, 2015) which will likely be useful as multi-region recordings become more prevalent in neuroscience (Keeley et al, 2020). Additionally, by substituting the linear kernel in p ( Y | X ) for an RBF kernel in Euclidean space (Wu et al, 2017) or on a non-Euclidean manifold (Jensen et al, 2020), we can recover scalable versions of recent GPLVM-based tools for neural data analyses with automatic relevance determination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach can also be extended in several ways to make it more useful to the neuroscience community. For example, replacing the spike count-based noise models with a point process model would provide higher temporal resolution (Duncker and Sahani, 2018), and facilitate inference of optimal temporal delays across neural populations (Lakshmanan et al, 2015) which will likely be useful as multi-region recordings become more prevalent in neuroscience (Keeley et al, 2020). Additionally, by substituting the linear kernel in p ( Y | X ) for an RBF kernel in Euclidean space (Wu et al, 2017) or on a non-Euclidean manifold (Jensen et al, 2020), we can recover scalable versions of recent GPLVM-based tools for neural data analyses with automatic relevance determination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next further analyzed the peri-stimulus-time histograms (PSTHs) of A1 and MGBv during stimulus presentation. We examined how neuronal activity in A1 was related to that in MGBv, using regression-based approaches (Semedo et al, 2019; 2020; Keeley et al, 2020) ( Figure 6E , see Methods ). Specifically, we calculated the mapping weights to reconstruct each A1 neuron’s PSTH from those of MGBv neurons under different conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as shown in Figure S6 F–G, we calculated the mapping vector from the Poisson generalized linear model (GLM) (Keeley et al, 2020). In the Poisson GLM, the instantaneous firing rate of A1 approximated by the above equation with a nonlinear kernel: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical relations of activity across brain regions have been traditionally used to infer causal interactions between them [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] . The majority of previous studies have relied on macroscopic measures of neural activity, such as the local field potential, EEG or fMRI BOLD signals [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in the macaque visual cortex, only a small subset of population activity patterns are statistically related to downstream activity 21 . Such findings have highlighted the importance of single cell resolution measurements in characterizing interareal interactions and have spurred the development of diverse multivariate statistical analysis methods to quantify the interactions between populations of neurons recorded across different brain areas [4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%