Power and Energy / 807: Intelligent Systems and Control / 808: Technology for Education and Learning 2013
DOI: 10.2316/p.2013.807-025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Aha! Moment: A Computational Mechanism for Restructuring and Incubation in Creative Problem Solving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although humans clearly separate themselves from other species with respect to creative problem-solving ability, the mechanisms by which we access previously nonapparent problem components when faced with challenging problems may be shared. For the 9-dot problem, for example, abstraction and a subsequent cascade may be involved in which the problem-solvers realize they can utilize any point on the page (abstraction from 9 dots to the x, y plane), which could subsequently lead to consideration of longer lines beyond the dots themselves, leading ultimately to the solution (Cheng et al, 2013; Kralik, Mao, Cheng, & Ray, 2016). Hence, we believe our study shows how comparative research can provide insights and impetus for further investigation of the specific mechanisms underlying human high-level cognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although humans clearly separate themselves from other species with respect to creative problem-solving ability, the mechanisms by which we access previously nonapparent problem components when faced with challenging problems may be shared. For the 9-dot problem, for example, abstraction and a subsequent cascade may be involved in which the problem-solvers realize they can utilize any point on the page (abstraction from 9 dots to the x, y plane), which could subsequently lead to consideration of longer lines beyond the dots themselves, leading ultimately to the solution (Cheng et al, 2013; Kralik, Mao, Cheng, & Ray, 2016). Hence, we believe our study shows how comparative research can provide insights and impetus for further investigation of the specific mechanisms underlying human high-level cognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, to find a new path to a restaurant one normally considers the most obvious means of transportation (e.g., walk, subway, car), and will take the most direct route available; these solutions are in turn bound by the factors of cost, availability, and intended effort. In contrast, creative problem-solving entails consideration of nonapparent problem components, which at first pass means those outside the scope of the original problem representation: i.e., those not as salient, directly relevant, or learned from experience (Cheng, Ray, Nguyen, & Kralik, 2013; Kralik, Mao, Cheng, & Ray, 2016; Kralik, Shi, & El-Shroa, 2016; Smith & Ward, 2012). A classic example with humans is the 9-dot problem, in which nine dots are displayed in a 3 × 3 square matrix, and the participant must connect all nine dots by drawing only four lines without lifting the pen/pencil (Cheng et al, 2013; Maier, 1930; van Steenburgh et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The algorithm, however, readily extends to cases in which the problem solver must generate the solution internally, which we have done with the classic 9-dot insight problem with humans (Cheng et al, 2013;van Steenburgh et al, 2012). The problem requires the participant to connect all nine dots by drawing only four lines without lifting the pen/pencil.…”
Section: Scaling To More Sophisticated Types Of Creative Problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is very difficult for humans because we continue to attempt the apparent, efficient solution in which lines are drawn that begin and end at dots; yet the nonapparent solution requires the problem solver to draw lines that extend beyond the dots. In Cheng et al (2013), we modeled the solution as a nonapparent action being added to the action set.…”
Section: Scaling To More Sophisticated Types Of Creative Problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%