2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018ja025506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Depletion and Recovery of the Outer Radiation Belt During a Geomagnetic Storm: Combined MHD and Test Particle Simulations

Abstract: During geomagnetic storms the intensities of the outer radiation belt electron population can exhibit dramatic variability. Deep depletions in intensity during the main phase are followed by increases during the recovery phase, often to levels that significantly exceed their prestorm values. To study these processes, we simulate the evolution of the outer radiation belt during the 17 March 2013 geomagnetic storm using our newly developed radiation belt model (Conservative Hamiltonian Integrator for Magnetosphe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
111
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that for this storm outward radial diffusion to the magnetopause acting alone can explain the observed flux drop across all L‐shells without the need for any other additional loss processes. These radial diffusion simulations of the flux dropout during the March 2013 storm are also consistent with the test particle simulations presented in Sorathia et al (). In addition, the steady inward motion of the observed outer radiation belt flux during the pre‐storm interval, before 17 March, is also reproduced by our radial diffusion simulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This indicates that for this storm outward radial diffusion to the magnetopause acting alone can explain the observed flux drop across all L‐shells without the need for any other additional loss processes. These radial diffusion simulations of the flux dropout during the March 2013 storm are also consistent with the test particle simulations presented in Sorathia et al (). In addition, the steady inward motion of the observed outer radiation belt flux during the pre‐storm interval, before 17 March, is also reproduced by our radial diffusion simulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our methodology builds on the approach described in detail in Appendix 1 of Sorathia et al (). Combining global MHD and test particle simulations allows us to simultaneously capture both global and mesoscale dynamics, for example, Kelvin‐Helmholtz vortices, that can facilitate solar wind entry and drift physics beyond the trueE×trueB drift of the MHD flow, which we find leads to dawn‐dusk asymmetry and particle energization during the entry process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining global MHD and test particle simulations allows us to simultaneously capture both global and mesoscale dynamics, for example, Kelvin‐Helmholtz vortices, that can facilitate solar wind entry and drift physics beyond the trueE×trueB drift of the MHD flow, which we find leads to dawn‐dusk asymmetry and particle energization during the entry process. In the remainder of this section we describe the salient details of our simulation pipeline, which consists of global electromagnetic fields that are generated using the Lyon‐Fedder‐Mobarry (LFM) MHD code (Lyon et al, ) to simulate the Earth's magnetosphere during northward IMF, an ensemble of test particles used to model a thick “wall” of solar wind created upstream of the Earth's bow shock using our test particle code CHIMP (Sorathia et al, ), and the magnetic field topology diagnostics we use to identify particle entry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inner zone proton belt is produced by a combination of Cosmic Ray Albedo Neutron Decay (CRAND; Singer, 1958), which occurs when cosmic rays scatter off the neutral atmosphere producing neutrons that decay with a 15-min half-life. Solar energetic protons associated with flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs; Reames, 2001) also become trapped in the Earth's magnetic field (Hudson et al, 1997;Kress et al, 2005;Selesnick et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introduction To Van Allen Radiation Beltsmentioning
confidence: 99%