1998
DOI: 10.1086/306476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Effects of Dust on Galactic Spectral Energy Distributions from the Ultraviolet to the Millimeter Band

Abstract: We present models of photometric evolution of galaxies in which the effects of a dusty interstellar medium have been included with particular care. A chemical evolution code follows the star formation rate, the gas fraction and the metallicity, basic ingredients for the stellar population synthesis. The latter is performed with a grid of integrated spectra of simple stellar populations (SSP) of different ages and metallicities, in which the effects of dusty envelopes around asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

41
1,536
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,019 publications
(1,584 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
41
1,536
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the relative lack of detailed data, detailed radiative transfer models and empirical template libraries have modeled the complex dust infrared emission from stars, molecular clouds and dust grains over a wide range of galaxy geometries and luminosities (Silva et al, 1998;Chary & Elbaz, 2001;Dale et al, 2001;Dale & Helou, 2002;Abel & Wandelt, 2002;Siebenmorgen & Krügel, 2007;Draine & Li, 2007). When discussing these models, it's important to keep in mind that the accuracy or applicability of these models cannot be tested with data since it simply does not exist in enough detail to disentangle effects of geometry, distribution, optical depth, etc.…”
Section: Employing Dust Radiative Transfer Models and Empirical Templmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the relative lack of detailed data, detailed radiative transfer models and empirical template libraries have modeled the complex dust infrared emission from stars, molecular clouds and dust grains over a wide range of galaxy geometries and luminosities (Silva et al, 1998;Chary & Elbaz, 2001;Dale et al, 2001;Dale & Helou, 2002;Abel & Wandelt, 2002;Siebenmorgen & Krügel, 2007;Draine & Li, 2007). When discussing these models, it's important to keep in mind that the accuracy or applicability of these models cannot be tested with data since it simply does not exist in enough detail to disentangle effects of geometry, distribution, optical depth, etc.…”
Section: Employing Dust Radiative Transfer Models and Empirical Templmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's also important to note that many have done work in this area, particularly modeling radiative transfer in local starburst populations to generate SEDs (Efstathiou & Rowan-Robinson, 1995;Efstathiou et al, 2000;Efstathiou & Siebenmorgen, 2009;Nenkova et al, 2002;Dullemond & van Bemmel, 2005;Piovan et al, 2006;Nenkova et al, 2008;Takagi et al, 2003;Fritz et al, 2006;Hönig et al, 2006;Schartmann et al, 2008), but here we try to focus on the techniques which have been most commonly employed for SED fitting of high-z dusty starbursts 11 . Silva et al (1998) developed the Grasil code to model galaxy emission by explicitly accounting for dust absorption and emission from the ultraviolet through to the far-infrared. They use stellar population synthesis models and a chemical evolution code to generate integrated spectra for simple stellar populations of different ages, metallicities, star formation rates, gas fractions, relative gas trapped in molecular clouds versus diffuse ISM, dust geometry and dust grain size distribution (small grains versus PAHs).…”
Section: Employing Dust Radiative Transfer Models and Empirical Templmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a final check, we fit self-consistent full UV to far-infrared SED models using the MAGPHYS 47 and GRASIL 48,49,50 codes. From these fits we derived the following lensing-corrected parameters: SFR = 10 +4 -2 M ⊙ yr -1 , log(M⋆/M ⊙ ) = 9.…”
Section: Emission Line Flux Detection Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty of building up a fast and accurate chemical evolution model -including chemical elements restored with a certain delay time from the star formation event -to couple with other population synthesis models, has represented an obstacle for developing a complete galaxy formation and evolution model for different groups in the past. Examples of works combining a chemical evolution model with the galaxy spectro-photometric evolution can be considered those of Brocato et al (1990); Bressan et al (1994); Gibson (1997); Silva et al (1998); Boissier & Prantzos (2000); Calura et al (2008); Cassarà et al (2015) for unresolved galactic stellar systems and Vincenzo et al (2016b) for resolved stellar systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%