2015
DOI: 10.1515/aicue-2015-0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Frequency of Auto Insurance Claims by Means of Poisson and Negative Binomial Models

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ver Hoef and Boveng (2007) illustrated the restriction of Poisson in modeling count data in ecology and suggested relative merits in quasi-Poisson regression and negative binomial regression over Poisson. When tests were conducted on the motor claim insurance frequency data, the negative binomial model was found to correct the overdispersion and presented a better fit for the data (David and Jemna 2015). In Naya et al (2008), the authors compared the performance of Poisson and ZIP models under four simulation scenarios to analyze field data and established that the ZIP models gave better estimates than the Poisson models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ver Hoef and Boveng (2007) illustrated the restriction of Poisson in modeling count data in ecology and suggested relative merits in quasi-Poisson regression and negative binomial regression over Poisson. When tests were conducted on the motor claim insurance frequency data, the negative binomial model was found to correct the overdispersion and presented a better fit for the data (David and Jemna 2015). In Naya et al (2008), the authors compared the performance of Poisson and ZIP models under four simulation scenarios to analyze field data and established that the ZIP models gave better estimates than the Poisson models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pemodelan frekuensi klaim yang telah dilakukan dalam kasus asuransi kendaraan bermotor seperti pemodelan frekuensi klaim menggunakan distribusi Gomez-Deniz Et. Al [5], dan pemodelan frekuensi klaim yang dilakukan menggunakan generalized linier model dengan asumsi data frekuensi klaim berdistribusi binomial negatif [3]. Pemodelan frekuensi klaim lain yang telah dilakukan yaitu pemodelan frekuensi klaim menggunakan generalized liniear model dengan asumsi data frekuensi klaim berdistribusi Hurdle-Poisson [2] dan pemodelan frekuensi klaim menggunakan model binomial negatif dan geometrik [10].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The coefficients of auto burden index and driving areas did not pass the significance test in the two distributions, so that they require to be further analyzed. David and Jemna (2015) fitted the claim frequency with the Poisson distribution and the Negative Binomial distribution respectively, they pointed out that the Negative Binomial distribution fitted claim frequency better than the Poisson distribution. According to the fitting results of the Poisson and negative binomial distributions of the claim frequency, the p-value of the estimated parameters in Poisson distribution is obviously smaller than that of the negative binomial distribution, indicating that the fitting result of Poisson distribution is relatively better.…”
Section: Loss Distribution Of Claim Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%