2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904846106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the immune rheostat of macrophages in the lung in response to infection

Abstract: In the lung, alternatively activated macrophages (AAM) form the first line of defense against microbial infection. Due to the highly regulated nature of AAM, the lung can be considered as an immunosuppressive organ for respiratory pathogens. However, as infection progresses in the lung, another population of macrophages, known as classically activated macrophages (CAM) enters; these cells are typically activated by IFN-␥. CAM are far more effective than AAM in clearing the microbial load, producing proinflamma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M 1 polarization timing and magnitude for an entire granuloma are significant factors in containing the infection. Our predictions are in line with those of Day et al (111), where they predicted switching times of ϳ50 days. Here we showed how stronger M 1 polarization 2 to 3 months postinfection is necessary to drive a stronger protective immune response that is better at containing bacterial proliferation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…M 1 polarization timing and magnitude for an entire granuloma are significant factors in containing the infection. Our predictions are in line with those of Day et al (111), where they predicted switching times of ϳ50 days. Here we showed how stronger M 1 polarization 2 to 3 months postinfection is necessary to drive a stronger protective immune response that is better at containing bacterial proliferation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Traditionally, contrasting phenotypes is accomplished through data analysis, from which speculative mechanisms explaining differences are inferred (Gingles et al, 2001; Lommatzsch et al, 2007; Prince et al, 2006; Ashman and Papadimitriou, 1992; Day et al, 2009; Ludewick et al, 2011; Buckley et al, 1997). Our ensemble-based approach determines putative mechanisms a priori , and quantifies their relative importance in explaining various phenotypes through distributional differences in phenotype-specific ensemble.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung-resident macrophages are another important regulator of pulmonary innate immunity, determining whether to initiate certain inflammatory cascades or remain quiescent in response to pathogenic or cellular damage (Day, et al, 2009). These cells are notoriously poor stimulators of T cell proliferation, and have been described under a variety of conditions to be regulatory in nature (Lambrecht, 2006).…”
Section: Innate and Adaptive Immunity In The Pathogenesis Of Emphymentioning
confidence: 99%