2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cdc40024.2019.9030208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the impact of on-line navigation devices in traffic flows

Abstract: We consider a macroscopic multi-population traffic flow model on networks accounting for the presence of drivers (or autonomous vehicles) using navigation devices to minimize their instantaneous travel cost to destination. The strategic choices of each population differ in the degree of information about the system: while part of the agents knows only the structure of the network and minimizes the traveled distance, others are informed of the current traffic distribution, and can minimize their travel time avo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tion to all individuals may optimally improve system performance. Indeed, our results show that random route choices of the uninformed drivers lead to the same increase of the critical in-rate at which congestion occurs as observed for averaged information, similar to previous work that investigated this effect on selfish routing without explicitly discussing the role of information delay 14,31,32 . The combination of analytical insights in the minimal two street network and the observations in networks suggests that our results may robustly transfer to more complex settings as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…tion to all individuals may optimally improve system performance. Indeed, our results show that random route choices of the uninformed drivers lead to the same increase of the critical in-rate at which congestion occurs as observed for averaged information, similar to previous work that investigated this effect on selfish routing without explicitly discussing the role of information delay 14,31,32 . The combination of analytical insights in the minimal two street network and the observations in networks suggests that our results may robustly transfer to more complex settings as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Specifically, it has been shown from a systemic perspective that selfish routing may lead to non-optimal collective states in which the travel time averaged across all vehicles is higher than the theoretical optimum 6,[8][9][10][11] . Furthermore, unpleasant side-effects exist, such as increased usage of low-capacity roads through residential areas, use of complicated routes with higher accident risk, and increased noise and air pollution [12][13][14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, almost all relevant works within the macroscopic dynamic routing framework present models in which the route choice is based on the current state of traffic and no delay is considered [2], [4], [5], [6]. It is worth to mention that in [1] the authors propose a framework that allows for dynamic routing of drivers based on delayed information, but they do not elaborate on the effects caused by the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macroscopic traffic flow models have known an increasing popularity in the last decades in the engineering and the applied mathematics literature, due to their capability of capturing traffic characteristics, their low computational cost and their relevance for solving optimal control problems [23,32]. Yet, new technical advances affecting transportation dynamics, like routing devices and autonomous vehicles, are changing the current traffic characteristics, requiring the design of new models [12,28,29]. In particular, vehicle automation paves the way to truck platooning, intended to optimize freight transportation and to reduce fuel consumption [2,18,24,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%