2021
DOI: 10.1057/s41264-021-00101-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the key factors influencing the adoption of mobile financial services: an interpretive structural modeling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model has been employed to examine acceptance of technology in various fields, including computing technologies (Dwivedi et al 2019 ; Ayaz and Yanartas 2020 ), digital decision support system (Aljarboa and Miah 2021 ; Laka et al 2021 ), learning technologies (Almaiah et al 2019 ; Chao 2019 ; Altalhi 2021 ), social media (Al-Azawei 2018 ; Puriwat and Tripoposakul 2021b ), and healthcare system (Alam et al 2018 ; Nunes et al 2019 ). The studies that examine adoption of technology for banking services with UTAUT model are well established (Martins et al 2014 ; Bhatiasevi 2016 ; Sarfaraz 2017 ; Friadi et al 2018 ; Savic and Vasic 2019 ; Singh and Srivastava 2020 ; Yang et al 2021 ; Gupta and Dhingra 2022 ). Meanwhile, e-learning (Maphosa et al 2020 ; Raza et al 2021 ; Qiao et al 2021 ); tourism (Pinto et al 2022 ; Chang et al 2022 ; Godovykh et al 2022 ); mobile food delivery (Puriwat and Tripopsakul 2021a ); and online shopping (Erjavec and Manfreda 2022 ) are among the studies that use the UTAUT model to probe intention to use during the COVID-19 crisis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This model has been employed to examine acceptance of technology in various fields, including computing technologies (Dwivedi et al 2019 ; Ayaz and Yanartas 2020 ), digital decision support system (Aljarboa and Miah 2021 ; Laka et al 2021 ), learning technologies (Almaiah et al 2019 ; Chao 2019 ; Altalhi 2021 ), social media (Al-Azawei 2018 ; Puriwat and Tripoposakul 2021b ), and healthcare system (Alam et al 2018 ; Nunes et al 2019 ). The studies that examine adoption of technology for banking services with UTAUT model are well established (Martins et al 2014 ; Bhatiasevi 2016 ; Sarfaraz 2017 ; Friadi et al 2018 ; Savic and Vasic 2019 ; Singh and Srivastava 2020 ; Yang et al 2021 ; Gupta and Dhingra 2022 ). Meanwhile, e-learning (Maphosa et al 2020 ; Raza et al 2021 ; Qiao et al 2021 ); tourism (Pinto et al 2022 ; Chang et al 2022 ; Godovykh et al 2022 ); mobile food delivery (Puriwat and Tripopsakul 2021a ); and online shopping (Erjavec and Manfreda 2022 ) are among the studies that use the UTAUT model to probe intention to use during the COVID-19 crisis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It measures a person’s belief in the availability of organizational and technological infrastructure to enable the use of technology. Facilitating conditions is the most essential factor driving the adoption of mobile financial services (Gupta and Dhingra 2022 ). The availability of resources and expectations of simplicity of use increase the likelihood of using e-money with a smart phone (Friadi et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Purposive sampling was adopted in selecting experts, as experts need expertise in green innovation and the textile industry. As suggested by Gupta and Dhingra (2021), criteria weights were derived from a consensus-based group discussion to minimize the subjectivity of experts. The model will be described in the phases below:…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher assessed the matrix's variables and attempted to establish any interdependencies amongst them based according to their own perspective and the ISM ruling's boundaries. The linkages in this matrix are the result of one variable influencing another or vice versa, while some elements may have equal impact and others may have none (Gupta & Dhingra, 2022;Rana et al, 2019Rana et al, , 2022Rafiq et al, 2021;Tamtam & Tourabi, 2021;Singh et al, 2018;Maheshwari et al, 2018). The interactions between the variables are represented by the symbols 'i' & 'j' in the rows and columns, respectively.…”
Section: Structural Self-interaction Matrix (Ssim)mentioning
confidence: 99%