2022
DOI: 10.31223/x5vd1p
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the size of co-seismic landslides via data-driven models: the Kaikōura's example

Abstract: The last three decades have witnessed a substantial methodical development of data-driven models for landslide prediction. However, this improvement has been dedicated almost exclusively to models designed to recognize locations where landslides may likely occur in the future. This notion is referred to as landslide susceptibility. However, the susceptibility is just one, albeit fundamental, information required to assess landslide hazard and to mitigate the threat that landslides may pose to human lives and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, no spatially nor temporally explicit model exists for landslide area density. However, four recent articles have explored the capacity of predicting landslide areas (Lombardo et al, 2021;Aguilera et al, 2022;Bryce et al, 2022;Moreno et al, 2022). All of them have returned suitable predictive performance, but still far from the match seen in the second panel of Figure 7, between observed and predicted landslide density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, no spatially nor temporally explicit model exists for landslide area density. However, four recent articles have explored the capacity of predicting landslide areas (Lombardo et al, 2021;Aguilera et al, 2022;Bryce et al, 2022;Moreno et al, 2022). All of them have returned suitable predictive performance, but still far from the match seen in the second panel of Figure 7, between observed and predicted landslide density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the point we are trying to raise here is questioning whether the susceptibility framework shouldn't be considered largely solved (Ozturk et al 2021), whenever heavily non-linear models are tasked with distinguishing the distribution of landslides purely in space. Conversely, the data-driven estimation of landslide intensity (Lari et al, 2014), whether it is spatially (Moreno et al, 2023), temporally (Nava et al, 2023), or spatiotemporally (Fang et al, 2024) addressed it is still at an infancy stage where few contributions are available and much may still be gained from a common geoscientific effort.…”
Section: Binary Vs Count Based Modelling Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we already envision future models that would take the measured extent of TSs and TEGs as the response variable, this time solving a regression task rather than a classification one as per the susceptibility requirement. Such a direction has recently been explored for landslides occurring at lower latitudes (Lombardo et al, 2021;Moreno et al, 2022). An even better extension has already been tested in which the expectation of locations prone to landslides are modelled, together with the expectation of the resulting landslide size (Aguilera et al, 2022;Bryce et al, 2022).…”
Section: Considerations Within and Beyond Svalbard: Supporting And Op...mentioning
confidence: 99%