2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the spatial distribution of above-ground carbon in Mexican coniferous forests using remote sensing and a geostatistical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remote detection of forest canopies is complex due to the size, shape, and dielectric properties of its scatter elements (leaves, branches, and stems) (Galeana-Pizaña et al 2014). The spatial diversity of forest canopies makes the relationship between forest parameters and remote sensing data a major challenge, although several studies have already demonstrated correlation between spectral data and forest characteristics of interest (Stojanova et al 2010, Viana et al 2012, Castillo-Santiago et al 2013, Fayad et al 2016, Gao et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote detection of forest canopies is complex due to the size, shape, and dielectric properties of its scatter elements (leaves, branches, and stems) (Galeana-Pizaña et al 2014). The spatial diversity of forest canopies makes the relationship between forest parameters and remote sensing data a major challenge, although several studies have already demonstrated correlation between spectral data and forest characteristics of interest (Stojanova et al 2010, Viana et al 2012, Castillo-Santiago et al 2013, Fayad et al 2016, Gao et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, HJ-CCD images and derived VIs were used in this study, and even though satisfactory results were obtained, the comparatively narrow spectral range still limited the more powerful VIs (e.g., reduced simple ratio (RSR) and cellulose absorption index (CAI)) used. In future studies, more powerful predictive variables derived from optical remote sensing datasets with broader spectral range (e.g., Landsat, Sentinel-2), light detection and ranging (LIDAR) [76] and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) [24] can be used, providing more information to train the dataset, which may lead to more accurate results. The study models were tested to determine their sensitivity to additional input variables (VIs); however, the impact of irrelevant information on model prediction was not tested in this study, and certain irrelevant and interference predictors can be introduced into the input variables to test their effect in future modeling.…”
Section: Model Comparison and Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, geostatistical prediction methods, including ordinary kriging (OK) [20], kriging with external trend [21,22], and regression kriging (RK) [23,24], which model the data structure of spatial autocorrelation and incorporate this information in the response variables for unsampled locations, have also been used to map environmental variables [25][26][27]. Remote sensing images are widely used as auxiliary data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was chosen because it demonstrated good performance in previous studies in forestry, such as that of Galeana-Pizana et al (2014).…”
Section: Variographic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%