2007
DOI: 10.1364/oe.15.003816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the target acquisition performance of active imaging systems

Abstract: Recent development of active imaging system technology in the defense and security community have driven the need for a theoretical understanding of its operation and performance in military applications such as target acquisition. In this paper, the modeling of active imaging systems, developed at the U.S. Army RDECOM CERDEC Night Vision & Electronic Sensors Directorate, is presented with particular emphasis on the impact of coherent effects such as speckle and atmospheric scintillation. Experimental results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Various system, target, and environment parameters are input to the model. Intermediate results are modulation transfer functions (MTF), noise variances, and contrast threshold functions.…”
Section: Analytical Range Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Various system, target, and environment parameters are input to the model. Intermediate results are modulation transfer functions (MTF), noise variances, and contrast threshold functions.…”
Section: Analytical Range Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of range-gated systems is limited by the sensor parameters as well as the target and atmospheric induced speckles, beam wander and image dancing 76,77 . Close to the range limit, the shot noise restricts the image quality.…”
Section: Spatially Resolved Vibration Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Moreover, the Rayleigh resolution was originally defined for incoherent illumination sources but more recent research has demonstrated that Rayleigh resolution increases with the degree of beam coherence. 21 Increasing beam coherence increases speckle noise 23 which, in turn, increases measurement uncertainty. The resolution of ToF scanners is further limited by the rise time of the laser pulse generated by the system, while both ToF and continuous-wave (AM and FM) scanners are limited by the resolution of the system clock.…”
Section: Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%