2020
DOI: 10.1002/ente.202000574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Thermal Conductivity of Porous Electrodes of Li‐Ion Batteries as a Function of Microstructure Parameters

Abstract: The performance and lifetime of lithium‐ion batteries are strongly influenced by the temperature distribution within the cells, as electrochemical reactions, transport properties, and aging effects are temperature dependent. However, thermal analysis and numerical simulation of the temperature inside the cells can only be as accurate as the underlying data on thermal transport properties. This contribution presents a numerical and analytical model for predicting the thermal conductivity of porous electrodes as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The considered length s for both mass and heat transfer is the dry film thickness of the electrode with a value of 83 μm (see Table 3 ). To account for the worst case, which is a completely dry electrode compared to a semiwet or wet electrode, the thermal conductivity of the dry electrode was considered with λ film = 2.46 W m −1 K −1 based on experimentally determined values found by Oehler et al [ 17 ] For the heat transfer coefficient α top , a value of α top = 39.3 W m −2 K −1 (see Table 4 ) is assumed, as explained in more detail in the following. The mass transfer coefficient is derived from the value of the heat transfer coefficient (see Section 3.4.1) with βs, air=0.0381 m s1.…”
Section: Simulation Of Drying Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considered length s for both mass and heat transfer is the dry film thickness of the electrode with a value of 83 μm (see Table 3 ). To account for the worst case, which is a completely dry electrode compared to a semiwet or wet electrode, the thermal conductivity of the dry electrode was considered with λ film = 2.46 W m −1 K −1 based on experimentally determined values found by Oehler et al [ 17 ] For the heat transfer coefficient α top , a value of α top = 39.3 W m −2 K −1 (see Table 4 ) is assumed, as explained in more detail in the following. The mass transfer coefficient is derived from the value of the heat transfer coefficient (see Section 3.4.1) with βs, air=0.0381 m s1.…”
Section: Simulation Of Drying Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous publication, [ 37 ] we presented a generic geometry generation routine for porous electrode coatings. In this work, the structure generation routine developed is extended by current collectors and separator layers so that the effective thermal conductivity of electrode stacks and cell stacks can be determined.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproduced with permission. [ 37 ] Copyright 2020, Wiley.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations