2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the THF clathrate hydrate dynamics by combining molecular dynamics and quasi-elastic neutron scattering

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure c shows spherically distributed THP molecules with a full quasispherical symmetry. The distribution of THF and THP molecules obtained in this study are consistent with the crystal structure model obtained by the single-crystal X-ray structure analysis , and dynamics data of THF hydrate by quasielastic neutron scattering …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure c shows spherically distributed THP molecules with a full quasispherical symmetry. The distribution of THF and THP molecules obtained in this study are consistent with the crystal structure model obtained by the single-crystal X-ray structure analysis , and dynamics data of THF hydrate by quasielastic neutron scattering …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The distribution of THF and THP molecules obtained in this study are consistent with the crystal structure model obtained by the single-crystal X-ray structure analysis 44,67 and dynamics data of THF hydrate by quasielastic neutron scattering. 68 It is also known that the smaller C 3 H 8 and iso-C 4 H 10 molecules have a spherical distribution in the 5 12 6 4 cages of the sII hydrate, 33,50,51 whereas CO 2 and C 2 H 6 in 5 12 6 2 cages of sI hydrate are distributed near the equatorial plane of the cage, with the long axis of these guests lying in the plane. 33,44,69 The distributions of guest molecules are influenced by the shape of host water cages.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of experimental and simulated scattering data is relatively common for both X-ray and neutron scattering. Typically, a model is proposed and the comparison is made between experiment and simulation without iterative refinement of the model, for example with X-ray (Wall et al, 2014;Skinner et al, 2013;Polak et al, 2014;Megyes et al, 2004;Hura et al, 2003;Hayes et al, 2011;Ferru et al, 2014;Eggert et al, 2002;Dhungana et al, 2016;Dambournet et al, 2011;Chupas et al, 2011;Buitrago et al, 2015;Bouazizi et al, 2006) and neutron (Zeidler et al, 2014;Petridis et al, 2011;Peterson et al, 2013;Peralta et al, 2008;Pefoute et al, 2017;McNutt, Wang et al, 2014;McNutt, McDonnell et al, 2017;Le et al, 2014;Hess et al, 2009;Gutié rrez & Johansson, 2002;Furuya et al, 1994;Du & Corrales, 2007;Drewitt et al, 2011;Bañ uelos et al, 2014) scattering. In fewer cases, some element of refinement of the structural parameters is included through an iterative refinement of the model, for example with X-ray (Jalilehvand et al, 2001;Daisenberger et al, 2011) and neutron (Lynch et al, 2017;Kučerka et al, 2012;Du et al, 2009) scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, researchers have focused on the kinetics and thermodynamic properties that promote hydrate formation. In order to reduce the phase equilibrium pressure of CO 2 hydrate, tetrahydrofuran (THF) is commonly used as a thermodynamic promoter of CO 2 hydrate. , THF could decline the phase equilibrium condition of (CO 2 + THF) mixed hydrates and the induction time of hydrate formation . Lee et al studied the effect of THF on hydrate formation in a CO 2 + H 2 mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%