Modeling US housing prices by spatial dynamic structural equation models

Abstract

This article proposes a spatial dynamic structural equation model for the analysis of housing prices at the State level in the USA. The study contributes to the existing literature by extending the use of dynamic factor models to the econometric analysis of multivariate lattice data. One of the main advantages of our model formulation is that by modeling the spatial variation via spatially structured factor loadings, we entertain the possibility of identifying similarity "regions" that share common time series components. The factor loadings are modeled as conditionally independent multivariate Gaussian Markov Random Fields, while the common components are modeled by latent dynamic factors. The general model is proposed in a state-space formulation where both stationary and nonstationary autoregressive distributed-lag processes for the latent factors are considered. For the latent factors which exhibit a common trend, and hence are cointegrated, an error correction specification of the (vector) autoregressive distributed-lag process is proposed. Full probabilistic inference for the model parameters is facilitated by adapting standard Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms for dynamic linear models to our model formulation. The fit of the model is discussed for a data set of 48 States for which we model the relationship between housing prices and the macroeconomy, using State level unemployment and per capita personal income.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/12-AOAS613 the Annals of Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

Using a latent variable model with non-constant factor loadings to examine PM2.5 constituents related to secondary inorganic aerosols

“…However, except for Zhang and Lee (2009) and Valentini et al . (2013), none of these existing advanced models specifically address the variation in the factor loadings exhibited among the constituent data (Figure 2a).…”

Detecting Intra-Urban Housing Market Spillover through a Spatial Markov Chain Model

“…The intra-urban spillover also differs from its inter-urban analogue in terms of the methodology need. The widely used vector auto-regressive (VAR) model [27,[41][42][43] in the inter-urban spillover is not sufficient to analyze the intra-urban spillover. VAR models are designed to capture the dynamic dependence of a sequence of finite dimensional random vectors.…”

“…The lower level includes a family of disjoint sub-networks each of which consists of nodes and edges within a city; the higher level is another network with its nodes representing cities and edges being connections among cities. Apparently, if our focus is on the inter-urban spillover, only the high level network is needed, which usually has a relatively small amount of nodes and can be embedded into a finite-(low-)dimensional VAR model [41]. However, for the intra-urban spillover within a city, only a sub-network at the low level is needed.…”

Dynamic structural equation models for directed cyclic graphs: the structural identifiability problem

“…Since graphical models refer to a broad range of mathematical formulations [6, 7, 8], limited by resources, here we focus on the structural equation model (SEM) representation of networks. SEM is a powerful statistical tool employed in many research fields such as economics [9, 10], environmental science [11], multivariate statistics [12, 13], social science [14] and biomedical engineering [15, 16]. While many previous studies considered static SEMs, lots of real systems are dynamic in nature such that dynamic SEM (DSEM) has been necessarily proposed to, e.g., accommodate time course observations [11, 14, 17, 18].…”

“…While many previous studies considered static SEMs, lots of real systems are dynamic in nature such that dynamic SEM (DSEM) has been necessarily proposed to, e.g., accommodate time course observations [11, 14, 17, 18]. Different from ordinary differential equation (ODE) models [1, 5, 6], DSEMs are discrete; also, DSEMs are more general than state-transition models [19, 20] since dynamic SEMs can accommodate both con-current effects and memory effects [9, 12, 14]. Therefore, DSEMs are deemed as a powerful and flexible mathematic language for describing complex dynamic network systems.…”