2018
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2018.00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Winter Precipitation Over the Juneau Icefield, Alaska, Using a Linear Model of Orographic Precipitation

Abstract: Assessing and modeling precipitation in mountainous areas remains a major challenge in glacier mass balance modeling. Observations are typically scarce and reanalysis data and similar climate products are too coarse to accurately capture orographic effects. Here we use the linear theory of orographic precipitation model (LT model) to downscale winter precipitation from the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) over the Juneau Icefield, one of the largest ice masses in North America (>4,000 km 2 ), for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different approaches to investigate winter precipitation over complex topography. Simple, though based on physical principles, the linear theory model (Smith and Barstad 2004) represents certain aspects of orographic precipitation over complex terrain (Roth et al 2018). The linear theory model, as well as numerical weather prediction models, is usually used at horizontal grid spacings of $1 km for precipitation studies (e.g., Richard et al 2007;Rasmussen et al 2011;Pontoppidan et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different approaches to investigate winter precipitation over complex topography. Simple, though based on physical principles, the linear theory model (Smith and Barstad 2004) represents certain aspects of orographic precipitation over complex terrain (Roth et al 2018). The linear theory model, as well as numerical weather prediction models, is usually used at horizontal grid spacings of $1 km for precipitation studies (e.g., Richard et al 2007;Rasmussen et al 2011;Pontoppidan et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative error (RE) of total precipitation is 7.5%. There are many factors affecting precipitation in mountainous areas [22], and the result is comparatively reasonable. The results show that the precipitation increased by 1.6 mm•a −1 (p < 0.01) from 1959 to 2015 ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Station Informationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…They found that the ERA-40-based simulation yields an about 0.13 m w.e. higher mass balance than the one based on ERA-Interim, but ERA-40-based simulations still show a 0.2 m drop of mass balance between 1970 and 1990, larger Sand et al (2003). (b) Scatterplot comparing the 1999 measurements to winter precipitation according to Sval_Imp (crosses) and ERA-Interim (dots).…”
Section: Air Temperaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Field work at Austfonna has been supported by NFR through IPY-Glaciodyn, EU-ice2sea and ESA-CRYOVEX. Knut Sand provided access to the Sand et al (2003) dataset.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%