2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and simulations of multilane traffic flow by kinetic theory methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the overall state of the system is described by a discrete probability distribution over groups of vehicles with velocity within a certain range. The model [68] has also been generalized to the case of multilane flow [31].…”
Section: Modeling Granular Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the overall state of the system is described by a discrete probability distribution over groups of vehicles with velocity within a certain range. The model [68] has also been generalized to the case of multilane flow [31].…”
Section: Modeling Granular Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,14] where both the acceleration and the slowing down interactions are modeled with a Vlasov-type relaxation towards a desired speed. Kinetic theory is also used to model multilane traffic flow [12,19,20,25,3], flows on networks [8], inhomogeneous space problems with non local interactions [18], control problems [15] and safety aspects in vehicular traffic [9]. For a review on kinetic traffic models, see [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them (e.g., context sensitivity, desired velocity, desired space headway, and desired time headway, anticipation) are applicable for microscopic traffic flow modelling of CAVs. It is clear that the efficiency of CAVs is different based on the type of vehicles, and each commuter sets their personalized trade-offs when commuting with AVs [70]. Such differences lead to various intelligent driving systems requiring their associated car-following models for AV-incorporated traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best knowledge of the authors, however, kinematics-based car-following models made substantial contributions to traffic flow modelling, but there are still some contradictions and conceptual weaknesses in their capability of describing the car following behavior in traffic flow. Besides, the aforementioned models are not developed based on kinematic theories for active particles, while vehicles are active particles whose mechanical properties play an essential role in traffic flow behavior [70][71][72]. In addition, driving behavior was only considered in these models to provide fast and efficient simulation, and models did not effectively consider Daganzo's remark [73].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%