2017
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201604556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict and Invent Reactions

Abstract: The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations. Herein, we propose a model that mimics chemical reasoning, and formalises reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph. We have constructed a knowledge graph containing 14.4 million molecules and 8.2 million binary reactions, which represents the bulk of all chemical reactions ever published in the scientific literature. Our model outperforms a rule-based… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
170
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
170
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent developments include fingerprint based representations of the molecular graph [204,205] or the 3D structure. [144,149,151,152] To date, machine learning based systems already outperform traditional methods in chemistry including examination by human experts and database search in several fields of work. [144,149,151,152] To date, machine learning based systems already outperform traditional methods in chemistry including examination by human experts and database search in several fields of work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent developments include fingerprint based representations of the molecular graph [204,205] or the 3D structure. [144,149,151,152] To date, machine learning based systems already outperform traditional methods in chemistry including examination by human experts and database search in several fields of work. [144,149,151,152] To date, machine learning based systems already outperform traditional methods in chemistry including examination by human experts and database search in several fields of work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, automatic retrosynthesis or reaction prediction (see Figure 5a) required information from databases and/or the manual encoding of chemical rules. Newer developments include the automated extraction of reaction rules, [143] new models for chemical reasoning, [144] heuristics aided methods, [145] and the use of machine learning. Some of the most widely used systems are ChemPlanner, [141] PathFinder, ICSynth, LHASA, CAMEO, SOPHIA, and EROS.…”
Section: Synthetic Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However,t he rule-based approachh as severald rawbacks:F irst, rule-based expert systems cannot predict anythingo utside of their knowledge, whichr enders them unablet od iscover novel chemistry. [4] Second, the rules have to be compiled and curated.T hey can eitherb el aboriously encoded by human experts, or extracted algorithmically from data. This procedure can be difficult because mechanistic understanding is usually needed to encode whichn eighbouring functional groups influence the outcome of ar eaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include Bioclipse [27, 28] and AMBIT [2931]. The CDK has also played a role in a number of chemical studies, such as finding the maximally bridging rings in chemical structures [32], prediction of organic reactions [33], and bioactivities of compounds [34]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%