2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2008.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling complex ethical decision problems with operations research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, there is an important research stream that combines sustainability principles and different predictive methodologies to estimate uncertainty situations with stakeholders (modeling and simulation of scenarios, backcasting, forecasting, and so on). Thus, the final objective is to facilitate project manager anticipation and rapid decision-making in those situations that are desirable for the project [89][90][91]. Taking into account that stakeholders have a growing social awareness, access to information and a critical opinion about the performance of companies regarding the impact of their economic activity, elements that are essential to stakeholders' participation in a project.…”
Section: Environmental Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, there is an important research stream that combines sustainability principles and different predictive methodologies to estimate uncertainty situations with stakeholders (modeling and simulation of scenarios, backcasting, forecasting, and so on). Thus, the final objective is to facilitate project manager anticipation and rapid decision-making in those situations that are desirable for the project [89][90][91]. Taking into account that stakeholders have a growing social awareness, access to information and a critical opinion about the performance of companies regarding the impact of their economic activity, elements that are essential to stakeholders' participation in a project.…”
Section: Environmental Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has acknowledged the need for IT evaluation framework building (Björnsson & Lundegård, 1992) and recommends to use and to develop more advanced, or combined instruments that take into account multi-criteria, multi-stakeholder, and systemic streams of OR (Kunsch, Kavathatzopoulos, & Rauschmayer, 2009). Different researchers and practitioners develop frameworks to guide decision makers through the process (Reiner & Stix, 2004;Remenyi, 1999).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method supports the requirement for IS evaluations to be tailored to the needs of individual settings based on their environment, the context of the evaluation, what is to be evaluated and the inclusion of needed stakeholders (Stockdale & Standing, 2006). Additionally, we answer the call for more advanced, or combined instruments to take into account multi-criteria, multi-stakeholder and systemic streams of operations research (Kunsch, Kavathatzopoulos, & Rauschmayer, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%