2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2202-6_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Continuous Cover Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ln is the natural logarithm, Δd i is the diameter increment (cm • yr −1 ) of tree i, DBH is the diameter at breast height (cm) of tree i calculated for the middle of the interval (Vanclay 1994, p. 158), BAL is the basal area in larger trees (m 2 • ha −1 ) of tree i, G is the plot basal area (m 2 • ha −1 ), and β i are the estimated parameters. This is an easily fit and robust model whose trend line is very similar to those of other models that represent the biological behavior of the diameter increment (Vanclay 2012). A value of 0.2 was added when fitting the diameter increment to accommodate negative or zero increments (common in tropical forests) and enable the logarithmic transformation of null and negative values, because omitting these observations would have introduced bias and resulted in overestimates of the diameter increment (Vanclay 1991a).…”
Section: Sub-models To Predict Forest Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…where ln is the natural logarithm, Δd i is the diameter increment (cm • yr −1 ) of tree i, DBH is the diameter at breast height (cm) of tree i calculated for the middle of the interval (Vanclay 1994, p. 158), BAL is the basal area in larger trees (m 2 • ha −1 ) of tree i, G is the plot basal area (m 2 • ha −1 ), and β i are the estimated parameters. This is an easily fit and robust model whose trend line is very similar to those of other models that represent the biological behavior of the diameter increment (Vanclay 2012). A value of 0.2 was added when fitting the diameter increment to accommodate negative or zero increments (common in tropical forests) and enable the logarithmic transformation of null and negative values, because omitting these observations would have introduced bias and resulted in overestimates of the diameter increment (Vanclay 1991a).…”
Section: Sub-models To Predict Forest Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Tree age should not be included as a predictor for growth in uneven-sized stands, due to large variances, both within stands Individual-tree distance-dependent growth models for uneven-sized Norway spruce (Peng 2000;Vanclay 2012) and within diameter-classes (Tarasiuk and Zwieniecki 1990). Instead, tree size is the most appropriate predictor of tree growth in structurally diverse stands (Shiue 1962;Zeide 1993;Pukkala et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix models, introduced by Leslie (1945) and modified by Lefkovitch (1965) by grouping organisms in terms of stage categories rather than age categories, have been applied to almost all the subject areas of forestry (Usher 1969, Caswell 2001, Vanclay 2012, Liang & Picard 2013. In forest management, matrix models have been applied, for example, to evaluate economic outcomes (Buongiorno & Michie 1980, Fortini et al 2015 and ecological impacts (Van Mantgem & Stephenson 2005, Zhou et al 2008, or to optimise silviculture in mixed uneven-aged forests to increase the recruitment of browse-sensitive tree species without intervening in the ungulate population (Ficko et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%