2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling crowd–bridge dynamic interaction with a discretely defined crowd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
69
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both modelling approaches have been used to simulate pedestrian crowd traffic only on footbridges that vibrate in the lateral direction (e.g. [34][35][36][37]). Despite a large number of proposed models and their comparisons in the literature [29,38], strong arguments in favour of one modelling approach and its outstanding performance in the context of vibration engineering still cannot be found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both modelling approaches have been used to simulate pedestrian crowd traffic only on footbridges that vibrate in the lateral direction (e.g. [34][35][36][37]). Despite a large number of proposed models and their comparisons in the literature [29,38], strong arguments in favour of one modelling approach and its outstanding performance in the context of vibration engineering still cannot be found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach could lead to estimate of probability of exceedance of a particular vibration level over given return period [19,20]. The drawback of this approach is that it could only be applied to stationary ergodic processes.…”
Section: Challenge 1: Randomnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, while peak force and contact ratio exhibit jump-by-jump variations, they are also correlated as shown in Figure 6. There is currently no simple guidance aimed at the structural engineers about incorporating this type of relationship in the probabilistic models; however there are a number of modelling proposals available in literature concerned with both walking [20,[24][25][26][27][28] and jumping/bobbing activities [29,30]. ( ) a Figure 5.…”
Section: Challenge 1: Randomnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations