2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling demand in restricted parking zones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parking modeling has been a topic of interest since the 1970s and has been studied from various angles, including parking patterns, impacts on traffic, off-street parking technologies, parking policy, choice and location models, and economic models describing parking conditions (Arnott & Rowse, 1991;Bonsall & Palmer, 2004;Hensher & King, 2001;Ibeas, Cordera, dell'Olio, & Moura, 2011;Van Der Goot, 1982;Wong, Tong, Lam, & Fung, 2000). An early review by Young, Thompson, and Taylor (1991) reported three categories of parking related models: driver behavior with respect to parking (parking choice), optimal positioning of parking lots (parking allocation), and interaction of parking operations with other transportation system elements and infrastructures (parking interaction).…”
Section: Parking Modeling: Objectives and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parking modeling has been a topic of interest since the 1970s and has been studied from various angles, including parking patterns, impacts on traffic, off-street parking technologies, parking policy, choice and location models, and economic models describing parking conditions (Arnott & Rowse, 1991;Bonsall & Palmer, 2004;Hensher & King, 2001;Ibeas, Cordera, dell'Olio, & Moura, 2011;Van Der Goot, 1982;Wong, Tong, Lam, & Fung, 2000). An early review by Young, Thompson, and Taylor (1991) reported three categories of parking related models: driver behavior with respect to parking (parking choice), optimal positioning of parking lots (parking allocation), and interaction of parking operations with other transportation system elements and infrastructures (parking interaction).…”
Section: Parking Modeling: Objectives and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comparison was made to establish the best specification of a hedonic regression to be introduced into a land use-transport interaction model (UrbanSim). The authors chose the SEM model as the most appropriate because the SDM model showed a large number of variables not significant and because the GWR showed a strong correlation between the estimated parameters, a phenomenon also found in other research (Ibeas et al, 2011;Wheeler and Tiefelsdorf, 2005).…”
Section: Bibliographic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, Kelly and Clinch (2006) found a 50% increase in the cost of on-street parking in central Dublin reduced demand and duration of stay by 15% and 16.5% respectively. However, the effects of parking regulations need to be carefully considered to avoid adverse congestion-related effects due to a lack of supply (Ibeas et al, 2011). Furthermore, increasing parking charges to encourage modal shift would likely be unpopular; in a 2011 study by the DfT (UK) only 20% of respondents considered increasing parking charges as an acceptable way for the government to encourage greater PT usage.…”
Section: Parking Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%