1998
DOI: 10.1080/095530098141113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling DNA damage induced by different energy photons and tritium beta-particles

Abstract: The developed model makes predictions compatible with features of available experimental data. Break complexity has to be addressed in biophysical modelling when the relative effectiveness of radiations in DNA damage is studied. Obtained data strongly argue against the dominance of direct radiation action in DNA damage in the cellular environment predicted by some theoretical studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these direct-type lesions could play an important role in the formation of multiply damaged sites (MDS) (21,22), and the neglect of this type of damage in calculations could cause significant under-estimation of the local severity of helical damage. For example, a direct-type strand break situated within 10 bases of an indirect-type strand break could result in a biologically more damaging double strand break (23) (24). In these types of calculations, it is important, therefore, to include the yields and distribution of direct-type damage.…”
Section: The Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these direct-type lesions could play an important role in the formation of multiply damaged sites (MDS) (21,22), and the neglect of this type of damage in calculations could cause significant under-estimation of the local severity of helical damage. For example, a direct-type strand break situated within 10 bases of an indirect-type strand break could result in a biologically more damaging double strand break (23) (24). In these types of calculations, it is important, therefore, to include the yields and distribution of direct-type damage.…”
Section: The Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these two papers, including data summarised by Krisch et al [13], the following values have been set for the model predictions obtained for 137 Cs or x-rays to conform to: an SSB/DSB ratio in nucleosomal DNA of between 20 and 30, DSB yield of 0.5-1×10 -8 Gy -1 bp -1 , an increase of DSB yield by a factor of the order of 2 following removal of the histone core and approximately two-thirds of the produced DSB being hydroxyl radical-mediated. A DSB yield of 1×10 -8 Gy -1 bp -1 is above the values observed in most studies with cellular DNA, which indicate a yield within the range 0.4-0.7×10 -8 Gy -1 bp -1 (see review in [2]). However, although our model does include DNA protection by a nucleosome core, we did not consider a chromatin fibre structure, which might further reduce the break yield [11].…”
Section: Dna Damagementioning
confidence: 74%
“…The method of modelling energy deposition has been described in detail previously [2]. In brief, to model effects from photons, we considered a spherical target with a diameter 1 µm in a photon radiation field.…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations