2018
DOI: 10.1080/19476337.2017.1392616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling effects of pre-storage treatments, maturity stage, low-cost storage technology environment and storage period on the quality of tomato fruit

Abstract: To cite this article: Getachew Neme Tolesa, Tilahun Seyoum Workneh & Sileshi Fanta Melesse (2018) Modelling effects of pre-storage treatments, maturity stage, low-cost storage technology environment and storage period on the quality of tomato fruit, CyTA -Journal of Food, 16:1, 271-280, ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to develop a model for prediction of the quality of tomato during storage. Two storage conditions (evaporatively cooled and ambient), four disinfection treatments (tap, anolyte, hot and chlorin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IS-treated tomato varieties showed lower decreases in firmness, while among the cultivars, the Dabol (large) variety showed the lowest decrease in firmness, from 28.83 to 20.49 N after 15 days of storage. Tolesa and Workneh [40] reported declines in the firmness of tomatoes harvested at the green, pink, and red maturity stages from 29 to 10 N, 25 to 13 N, and 20.5 to 10 N, respectively, over a storage period of 21 days inside an evaporative cooler, which is in agreement with the present findings. Majidi et al [41] reported that controlled atmosphere storage maintained tomato firmness better than cold storage during the first 10 days of storage, and that a steeper decline in firmness (65 N to 59 N) was observed from 10 to 20 days of storage.…”
Section: Firmnesssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IS-treated tomato varieties showed lower decreases in firmness, while among the cultivars, the Dabol (large) variety showed the lowest decrease in firmness, from 28.83 to 20.49 N after 15 days of storage. Tolesa and Workneh [40] reported declines in the firmness of tomatoes harvested at the green, pink, and red maturity stages from 29 to 10 N, 25 to 13 N, and 20.5 to 10 N, respectively, over a storage period of 21 days inside an evaporative cooler, which is in agreement with the present findings. Majidi et al [41] reported that controlled atmosphere storage maintained tomato firmness better than cold storage during the first 10 days of storage, and that a steeper decline in firmness (65 N to 59 N) was observed from 10 to 20 days of storage.…”
Section: Firmnesssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pinheiro et al [49] also found a decrease in the hue angle values over a storage period of 30 days and recommended a storage temperature of 10 °C to better preserve tomato quality, avoid chilling injuries, and extend shelf life, which is in agreement with our findings. The slowing down of color development could be due to physiological respiration, which could influence the quality of stored tomatoes throughout the storage period [40]. Srinivasa et al [48] observed a decrease of hue angle values during the storage of tomato fruits using eco-friendly films.…”
Section: Hue Angle (H°)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruits of different usages should be picked at different stages of maturity. The picking time needs to be properly advanced or delayed, according to the specific usage [4][5][6][7]. Due to the limitations of warehousing and logistics, fruits should not be picked when they are too mature or raw.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%