2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling evidence of stress concentration mitigation at the micro-scale in polymer composites by the addition of carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same tendency, using different constitutive materials, mixing techniques, and measurement tests, can be found in other reports; for example, Chandrasekaran et al [7] reported an increase of 36% on the IFSS, Godara et al of 36% [12], Sager et al of 71% [13], Lv et al of 175% [14], Yang et al of 190% [15], Li et al of 40% [16], and Wang et al of 71% [17]. Romanov et al [18][19][20] used modeling to explain the effect of CNTs in the fiber/matrix interface, showing that the CNTs suppress the stress concentrations on the microlevel of the composite and therefore the IFSS improvement; nevertheless, experimental evidence is not easy to obtain. The overall increase should surely depend on the CNTs concentration, as shown numerically by Yang et al [15]; however, for nanoengineered reinforced composites obtained by mixing and liquid transfer molding techniques, the CNTs concentration does not generally go beyond 0.5 wt.% due to the filtering effect; see, for example, the work of Gojny et al [8] and Jiménez-Suárez et al [21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The same tendency, using different constitutive materials, mixing techniques, and measurement tests, can be found in other reports; for example, Chandrasekaran et al [7] reported an increase of 36% on the IFSS, Godara et al of 36% [12], Sager et al of 71% [13], Lv et al of 175% [14], Yang et al of 190% [15], Li et al of 40% [16], and Wang et al of 71% [17]. Romanov et al [18][19][20] used modeling to explain the effect of CNTs in the fiber/matrix interface, showing that the CNTs suppress the stress concentrations on the microlevel of the composite and therefore the IFSS improvement; nevertheless, experimental evidence is not easy to obtain. The overall increase should surely depend on the CNTs concentration, as shown numerically by Yang et al [15]; however, for nanoengineered reinforced composites obtained by mixing and liquid transfer molding techniques, the CNTs concentration does not generally go beyond 0.5 wt.% due to the filtering effect; see, for example, the work of Gojny et al [8] and Jiménez-Suárez et al [21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The CNTs were modeled and inserted into a bulk polymer model using the embedded mesh technique. 33 The results of the micromechanical model with an RVE containing the polymer matrix and randomly generated CNTs are presented here. The model is simulated in the commercial Finite Element Package Abaqus 6.13 with the damage equations implemented in a user material subroutine.…”
Section: Microscale Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unit cell dimensions are varied in order to alter the weight fraction of the CNTs in the micro-RVE. The material properties and dimensions of the CNTs are obtained from Romanov et al 33 and are reported in Table 4. The randomly generated CNTs are shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Generation Of the Micro-length Scale Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4] As an alternative, CNTs can be directly grafted onto carbon fibers (CNT-g-CFs), during synthesis, to form a hierarchical reinforcement, combining nanoscale and microscale reinforcements. Computational models of this type of hierarchical composites predict a net benefit when CNTs are present at the fiber surface, [5][6][7][8][9][10] through diffusion of stresses across the critical fibermatrix region, as found in some biological systems. [10] Another motivation for including CNTs in composites is to create a conductive network which can be used for in-situ damage detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%