2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle – A case study for saproxylic insect conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
134
2
33

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
134
2
33
Order By: Relevance
“…fungus fruiting bodies) available within the individual woodland stands (Rukke and Midtgaard 1998;Rukke 2000). Furthermore, in a study on an endangered longhorn beetle living on dead trees, Buse et al (2007) revealed that variables measured at the tree level were better predictors of presence of the species than spatial measurements between trees. These examples indicate the overall importance of within patch (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…fungus fruiting bodies) available within the individual woodland stands (Rukke and Midtgaard 1998;Rukke 2000). Furthermore, in a study on an endangered longhorn beetle living on dead trees, Buse et al (2007) revealed that variables measured at the tree level were better predictors of presence of the species than spatial measurements between trees. These examples indicate the overall importance of within patch (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies specifically on woodland species have found similar relationships. Most such studies to date have focused on endangered ground or tree related beetle species (Rukke and Midtgaard 1998;Rukke 2000;Siitonen and Saaristo 2000;Sroka and Finch 2006;Buse et al 2007;Matern et al 2007) and butterfly species (Thomas et al 1992;Konvicka et al 2007). These studies have similarly found positive relationships with measures of food availability (Rukke and Midtgaard 1998;Rukke 2000;Buse et al 2007) and negative relationships with occupied nearest neighbour distance between habitat patches (Thomas et al 1992;Rukke and Midtgaard 1998;Rukke 2000;Siitonen and Saaristo 2000;Buse et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, relatively immobile invertebrates have been neglected by previous landscape ecology research (Mazerolle and Villard 1999;Bailey 2007). Understanding the impact of habitat fragmentation on this group of species is of particular importance, as many have highly restricted distributions and are considered as priorities for conservation action; they may also be especially vulnerable to fragmentation impacts (Ranius 2002;Buse et al 2007;Matern et al 2007;NBN Gateway 2007). Those investigations undertaken to date have focused primarily on beetles, and have revealed differing responses to fragmentation based on variation in the degree of habitat specialisation (Rukke and Midtgaard 1998;Ranius 2000;Rukke 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The keystone species have a disproportionately large effect on ecosystems, compared to their abundance or biomass (e.g. Simberloff 1998;Buse et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%