2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling how carbon affects soil structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Curaqueo et al (2010), the soil structure involves the shape, degree and size of the aggregates, consequently this property regulates the porosity, and therefore, the retention and availability of water, in addition to its capacity to contain air, as well as the growth of crop roots. The water retention capacity in the soil depends on the number of pores, the pore size distribution and specific surface area of each floor (Malamoud et al, 2009). Therefore, the MOS generally has a positive effect on the ability to retain water (Thierfelder and Wall, 2009), although the synergistic effect of MOS on these and other properties is not entirely clear (Malamoud et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to Curaqueo et al (2010), the soil structure involves the shape, degree and size of the aggregates, consequently this property regulates the porosity, and therefore, the retention and availability of water, in addition to its capacity to contain air, as well as the growth of crop roots. The water retention capacity in the soil depends on the number of pores, the pore size distribution and specific surface area of each floor (Malamoud et al, 2009). Therefore, the MOS generally has a positive effect on the ability to retain water (Thierfelder and Wall, 2009), although the synergistic effect of MOS on these and other properties is not entirely clear (Malamoud et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water retention capacity in the soil depends on the number of pores, the pore size distribution and specific surface area of each floor (Malamoud et al, 2009). Therefore, the MOS generally has a positive effect on the ability to retain water (Thierfelder and Wall, 2009), although the synergistic effect of MOS on these and other properties is not entirely clear (Malamoud et al, 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also of local importance as it describes ecosystem function, soil fertility, water holding capacity, stabilizing soil aggregates and other many functions (The GEFSOC project team 2006). The SOC turnover models have also taken on the prediction of the impact of climate change to SOC turnover on a global scale (Jones et al 2005), spatial mapping of national SOC stock (van Wasemael et al 2010;Meersmans et al 2011), assessing the future carbon sequestration at national and watershed scale (Webb et al 2003;Milne et al 2007;Schulp et al 2008;Smith et al 2009;Yokozawa et al 2010), proposing agricultural management practices at the field scale (Liang et al 2008), and modeling stabilization mechanism of soil structure at the micro scale (Malamoud et al 2009). Beyond this, SOC turnover models are vital tools for describing ecosystem functions, therefore, establishment and/or purpose-upgrading of SOC models to fit specific environmental conditions are an essential part as a bridge between the local scale and global scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%