2019
DOI: 10.1127/entomologia/2019/0607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling jumping in Locusta migratoria and the influence of substrate roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better understand, Figure 6 provides some schematic representations of locusts' anatomy and cinematic. In particular, Figure 6A (Rogers et al, 2016) shows a representation of the internal anatomy of a hind femur, characterized by a massive, pennate extensor tibiae muscle and a very small flexor tibiae FIGURE 6 | (A) Mechanical diagram of the interactions between the extensor tibiae muscle, its apodeme and the semilunar processes: during the contraction just before jumping, the apodeme pulls on and distorts the front part of the femoro-tibial joint, bending the semi-lunar processes (Rogers et al, 2016); (B) configuration's variation from the steady stare to the jumping state (Rogers et al, 2016); (C) theoretical model of locust jumping cinematics (Mo et al, 2019); (D) lumped parameter model of muscles' arrangement in locust jump (Rogers et al, 2016). muscle, while Figure 6B (Rogers et al, 2016) shows how the leg configuration varies from the steady phase to the jumping phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To better understand, Figure 6 provides some schematic representations of locusts' anatomy and cinematic. In particular, Figure 6A (Rogers et al, 2016) shows a representation of the internal anatomy of a hind femur, characterized by a massive, pennate extensor tibiae muscle and a very small flexor tibiae FIGURE 6 | (A) Mechanical diagram of the interactions between the extensor tibiae muscle, its apodeme and the semilunar processes: during the contraction just before jumping, the apodeme pulls on and distorts the front part of the femoro-tibial joint, bending the semi-lunar processes (Rogers et al, 2016); (B) configuration's variation from the steady stare to the jumping state (Rogers et al, 2016); (C) theoretical model of locust jumping cinematics (Mo et al, 2019); (D) lumped parameter model of muscles' arrangement in locust jump (Rogers et al, 2016). muscle, while Figure 6B (Rogers et al, 2016) shows how the leg configuration varies from the steady phase to the jumping phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locusts can adapt to substrates of various roughness, thanks to a combined grasping mechanism consisting of rigid claws that generate mechanical interlocking on rough substrates, and adhesive pads for vacuum adhesion on smooth substrates (Goodwyn et al, 2006 ; Wang et al, 2009 , 2015 ; Mo et al, 2019 ). This particular characteristic can be considered as a sort of morphological intelligence, which makes locusts capable of dealing with a wide variety of substrates, even much different from each other, avoiding slipping phenomena in both jumping and landing phase (Woodward and Sitti, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A white-colored solid jumping platform was positioned inside a foam box (70 × 35 × 30 cm). The jumping platform was lit with four LED illuminators (RODER SRL, Oglianico TO, Italy) which emit red light (420 lm each at k = 628 nm) to match the maximum absorption frequency of the camera [49][50][51][52][53]. The jumping behavior of each locust was stimulated by teasing the rear of its body with a transparent plastic bar (2 mm diameter), to elicit the maximum "escape jumps."…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Materials Preparation A Set Of 29mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of the ground are another set of environmental factors that can potentially affect the locust jump, especially during the take-off stage. For example, surface roughness with an Ra value of 1-2 µm can reduce the ability of locust legs to attach to the substrate, resulting in considerable slippage of the hind legs on the ground and thus take-off failure [21,22]. Similar effects of surface roughness have also been documented in females of the Mediterranean field cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus) crawling on smooth surfaces (R q = 7.3 µm), which resulted in significantly lower phonotactic responses compared with rougher surfaces (R q = 16 or 180 µm) [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%