2021
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling management strategies for chronic disease in wildlife: Predictions for the control of respiratory disease in bighorn sheep

Abstract: 1. Controlling persistent infectious disease in wildlife populations is an ongoing challenge for wildlife managers and conservationists worldwide, and chronic diseases in particular remain a pernicious problem.2. Here, we develop a dynamic pathogen transmission model capturing key features of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infection, a major cause of population declines in North American bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis. We explore the effects of model assumptions and parameter values on disease dynamics, including den… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Managers planning test‐and‐remove efforts surrounding new disease events should proceed with caution within the epidemic's first few months to avoid removing animals who might eventually recover (especially if the disease‐induced mortality burden of the event among adults is low). Lastly, data on incubation period, timing of seroconversion, and timing of clinical signs have direct utility for epidemiological models that help guide management (e.g., Almberg et al, 2021 ). We hope these data can aid research and management going forward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Managers planning test‐and‐remove efforts surrounding new disease events should proceed with caution within the epidemic's first few months to avoid removing animals who might eventually recover (especially if the disease‐induced mortality burden of the event among adults is low). Lastly, data on incubation period, timing of seroconversion, and timing of clinical signs have direct utility for epidemiological models that help guide management (e.g., Almberg et al, 2021 ). We hope these data can aid research and management going forward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have speculated that environmental context could have important bearing on the severity of M. ovipneumoniae spillover events (Butler et al, 2018 ; Manlove et al, 2014 ), and these speculations are supported by several comparative studies documenting variation in bighorn sheep disease severity across environments (e.g., Butler et al, 2018 ). There is evidence that herd mixing patterns may constrain disease burden in lambs (Manlove et al, 2014 ) and could therefore play a role in herd recovery (Almberg et al, 2021 ; Dugovich et al, 2017 ; Lula et al, 2020 ). Environmental context could also effect epidemiological patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We quantified risk for 29 extant populations of bighorn sheep that overlap mountain goat herds, 58 extant populations of mountain goats, and up to 5 additional mountain goat populations (as specified by each AMS). At the time of analysis, 1 population of bighorn sheep was sympatric with a mountain goat population that was known to carry pneumonia‐associated pathogens, while 24 mountain goat populations were sympatric with bighorn sheep that were known to carry pneumonia‐associated pathogens (Almberg et al 2016, 2018, 2019). Therefore, 1–29 bighorn sheep populations were exposed to pneumonia‐associated pathogens from mountain goats, and 24–58 mountain goat populations were currently harboring or exposed to pathogens from bighorn sheep.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of epidemiological models can thus support and guide in situ management actions a priori (e.g. Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae , Almberg et al, 2022). On‐ground disease management efforts in wildlife are the practical application of model‐derived management recommendations, which may reveal unidentified or underappreciated variables relevant to management (e.g.…”
Section: The Value Of Model Integrated Disease Management For Wildlifementioning
confidence: 99%