1992
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(92)90043-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling milk yield, milk components and body composition changes in the lactating sow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be because physiological development of reproductive organs differs with parity (Oh et al, 2006). Thus, milk production in gilts may be 20% lower than in multiparous sows, as a consequence of lower feed intake and additional requirements of energy for tissue growth (Walker & Young, 1993). Therefore, sow performance during the first parity may not be used to predict its performance in future parities, particularly in D21LWT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This may be because physiological development of reproductive organs differs with parity (Oh et al, 2006). Thus, milk production in gilts may be 20% lower than in multiparous sows, as a consequence of lower feed intake and additional requirements of energy for tissue growth (Walker & Young, 1993). Therefore, sow performance during the first parity may not be used to predict its performance in future parities, particularly in D21LWT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Mothering ability measured by LW21 may be considered as a composite trait, combining litter size and average piglet weight at 21 days, which depend on the number of piglets born and the piglets preweaning survival and growth. Milk production in gilts may be 20% lower than in multiparous sows, as a consequence of lower feed intake and additional requirements of energy for tissue growth (Walker and Young, 1993). According to the estimated parity effects on LW21, the best mothering ability of Torbiscal sows is achieved at parity 2 and it slightly decreases in the later parities, being similar the maternal aptitude of sows at the parities 1 and 5.…”
Section: Analysis With Repeatability Animal Model (Rm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sow lactation and pre‐weaning growth of piglets are of increasing physiological and productive interest ( van der S teen and de G root 1993; W alker and Y oung 1993), genetic studies are restricted by the need for a large amount of data not usually recorded in breeding programmes. One practical measure of sow milk production is the litter weight, assuming the only feed of the piglets is their milk intake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%