2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0427(99)00171-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling multicomponent adsorption process by a moving finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e general rate model (GRM), the lumped kinetic model, and the dispersive equilibrium model are the most frequently and commonly utilized models in liquid chromatography. In the literature, multiple numerical techniques like finite volumes method, finite-difference method, and finite element methods have been employed to simulate the chromatographic models [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e general rate model (GRM), the lumped kinetic model, and the dispersive equilibrium model are the most frequently and commonly utilized models in liquid chromatography. In the literature, multiple numerical techniques like finite volumes method, finite-difference method, and finite element methods have been employed to simulate the chromatographic models [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches are the finite volume method (FVM) with flux limiters based on total variation diminishing (TVD) to avoid the spurious oscillations (LeVeque, 2002) and the finite element method (FEM) with moving nodes to reduce computational load (Coimbra et al, 2000). Since oscillatory errors cause critical problems in the simulation of physical systems, weighted essentially nonoscillatory (WENO) schemes were introduced (Liu et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%