Modelling of impeller-tumbler wear test with discrete element method

Zolotarevskiy, Vadim; Gallo, Santiago Corujeira; Pereira, Michael; Barnett, Matthew

doi:10.1016/j.wear.2022.204509

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is generally quantified by measuring the loss of material, and currently experimental (Pérez et al, 2010;López, 2011;González, 2012;Jia y Zhou, 2012;Rojek, 2014;Singh et al, 2017;Obrad et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2018;Bedolla et al, 2018) and numerical methods have been used for its study. Among the numerical ones, the Distinct or Discrete Element Method (DEM) has the most application for the study of abrasive wear (Graff, 2010;Rojek, 2014;Perazzo et al, 2016;Hoormazdi et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2018;Ucgul et al, 2017, Graff, 2010, Bedolla et al, 2018Montes, Herrera, López, Pérez, & Torres, 2023;Zolotarevskiy, Gallo, Pereira, & Barnett, 2022;Zhang, Fu, Ren, Liu, Lin, Zhang & Zhang, 2024). The advantage of the latter over traditional methods is that it allows predicting the behaviour of a given phenomenon, and also decreases the time required for testing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Numerical and Experimental Analysis of the Abrasive Wear Of Two Steels Used in Tillage Tools

SÁNCHEZ-IZNAGA,

MONTES-RODRÍGUEZ,

TORRES-RODRÍGUEZ

et al. 2024

INMATEH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study combines computer simulation using the Discrete Element Method (DEM) with field experiments to assess the resistance to abrasive wear of AISI 1010 and AISI C1064 steels in tillage tools. It was found that the wear on AISI 1010 was over 50% higher than on AISI C1064. The DEM model accurately predicted wear (e=0.005g, R^2=99.8%), regardless of operational conditions and steel characteristics. The mean absolute errors of the simulation compared to field tests were 0.01937 g for AISI C1064 and 0.08619 g for AISI 1010.

show abstract