A new thermal-mechanical finite element model capable of taking into account changes in the specific volume during austenite to ferrite g-a transformation during cooling has been developed. This model, coupled with any of the existing phase transformation models, allows simulation of the sample shortening due to both thermal contraction and the dilatometric effect. The solution is considered as a direct problem model for inverse calculations. The distance between predicted and measured sample elongations is formulated as the cost function for the inverse analysis. It has been shown that the random distribution of the appearing ferritic phase within the sample cross section results in more gentle changes in the sample elongations with time during cooling than that in the case of the conventional approach. This allowed achievement of satisfactory agreement between the experimental and predicted curves in the dilatometric test reflecting both the dilatometric effect and thermal contraction of the specimen during cooling through austenite-ferrite transformation temperatures.KEY WORDS: dilatometric test modelling; austenite ferrite transformation; inverse analysis; direct problem.
ExperimentalThe chemical composition of the carbon-manganese steel used in the dilatometric tests is given in Table 1. The steel had been cast under industrial conditions at Sendzimir's Steel Plant in Poland. It does not contain significant amounts of alloying elements and is considered as a base material for identification of phase transformation model parameters. Changes in the microstructure of this steel during thermo-mechanical treatment depend mainly on dissolution and precipitation of the niobium carbide (NbC).Dilatometer DIL 805 (Bahr GmbH) was used in the experiments. The sizes of the tubular specimens were as follows: inner diameter, 2 mm; outer diameter, 4 mm; height, 10 mm. The test procedure is shown schematically in Fig. 1. After austenitization at 950°C, the samples were cooled down at a constant rate varying from 0.5 to 163 K/s. The sample elongation was recorded and plotted against temperature (Fig. 2). The microstructure of the steel was analyzed microscopically after the tests along with hardness measurements using transverse cross sections of the samples. The surface fractions of the phases were determined using an image analyzer IBAS (Konthom Gmbh). Table 2 illustrates typical results obtained during the experimental work. The corresponding transformation start and finish temperatures increase while the hardness decreases with a reduction in the cooling rate.
Phase Transformation ModelThere are various models that describe the kinetics of the austenite-ferrite transformation in steels during cooling. These models describe parameters of the austenite-ferrite transformation such as the transformation start temperature, nucleation and growth, and site saturation. [8][9][10] Some of the models are extended and include austenite-pearlite, austen- ISIJ International, Vol. 46 (2006) ite-bainite and austenite-martensite tra...