2017
DOI: 10.1007/s41115-017-0001-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of stellar convection

Abstract: The review considers the modelling process for stellar convection rather than specific astrophysical results. For achieving reasonable depth and length we deal with hydrodynamics only, omitting MHD. A historically oriented introduction offers first glimpses on the physics of stellar convection. Examination of its basic properties shows that two very different kinds of modelling keep being needed: low dimensional models (mixing length, Reynolds stress, etc.) and "full" 3D simulations. A list of affordable and n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
102
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 311 publications
(630 reference statements)
3
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On scales where Pé 1, i.e., where the convective turn-over timescale is shorter than the diffusion timescale, penetrating material can modify the entropy in the stably stratified region. Material in high Pé regimes, such as at the base of the solar convective envelope (where Pé is O(10 5 ), Kupka & Muthsam 2017), can continue to travel adiabatically with the overall effect of extending the convective region. As a consequence it weakens the stratification in stable zones, and thus gives rise to a thermal boundary or transition layer.…”
Section: Observational Evidence For Cbm In Stellar Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On scales where Pé 1, i.e., where the convective turn-over timescale is shorter than the diffusion timescale, penetrating material can modify the entropy in the stably stratified region. Material in high Pé regimes, such as at the base of the solar convective envelope (where Pé is O(10 5 ), Kupka & Muthsam 2017), can continue to travel adiabatically with the overall effect of extending the convective region. As a consequence it weakens the stratification in stable zones, and thus gives rise to a thermal boundary or transition layer.…”
Section: Observational Evidence For Cbm In Stellar Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a new possibility has appeared for determining convective efficiency values from 3D simulations of stellar envelopes. These simulations solve the time-dependent hydrodynamic equations of mass, momentum, and energy conservation and are by design free from adjustable parameters such as the α MLT (e.g., [61,62], and references therein). Using suitable averages, it is possible to match the atmospheric stratification of the 3D model with the equivalent from one-dimensional calculations and extract a calibrated convective efficiency (e.g., [63,64]).…”
Section: Convective Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the instrumental noise, the remaining sources of uncertainty have stellar origins. They are the center-tolimb variation of the convective blue-shift (Dravins et al 2017;Cegla et al 2016a;Shporer & Brown 2011), granulation, oscillations and the convective broadening due to granulation (Kupka & Muthsam 2017, and references therein). We then explored how well the stellar differential rotation could be characterized and the precision with which we can retrieve the projected spin-orbit angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%