2022
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2022-365
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of street-scale pollutant dispersion by coupled simulation of chemical reaction, aerosol dynamics, and CFD

Abstract: Abstract. In the urban environment, gas such as nitrogen dioxide NO2, and particles impose adverse impacts on pedestrians’ health. The conventional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods that regard pollutant as passive scalar cannot reproduce the formation of secondary pollutants, such as NO2 and secondary inorganic and organic aerosols, leading to uncertain prediction. In this study, SSH-Aerosol, a modular box model that simulates the evolution of gas, primary and secondary aerosols, is coupled with the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower concentration difference for PM 10 than for the other compounds reflects that non-traffic sources are more important for PM 10 , and inversely they are small for BC. Despite the higher concentrations in MUNICH-hete-l1, BC concentrations remain strongly underestimated compared to observations, in agreement with the CFD simulations of Lin et al (2022). For PM 10 , NO 2 and NO x , the concentrations compare well to observations, e.g.…”
Section: Jagtvejsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The lower concentration difference for PM 10 than for the other compounds reflects that non-traffic sources are more important for PM 10 , and inversely they are small for BC. Despite the higher concentrations in MUNICH-hete-l1, BC concentrations remain strongly underestimated compared to observations, in agreement with the CFD simulations of Lin et al (2022). For PM 10 , NO 2 and NO x , the concentrations compare well to observations, e.g.…”
Section: Jagtvejsupporting
confidence: 81%