1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(98)00077-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of temperature and forces when orthogonally machining hardened steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17b shows that temperatures are increasing with the cutting speed and feed rate. No experiments were performed to verify the results, however, the range of temperatures and behavior predicted by FE models are in agreement with similar studies on high speed turning of H13 (Ng et al, 1999;Ng and Aspinwall, 2002a;2002b). Only FE models are able to predict temperatures as the SPH solver utilized in this study is unable to perform coupled temperature displacement analysis.…”
Section:   supporting
confidence: 70%
“…17b shows that temperatures are increasing with the cutting speed and feed rate. No experiments were performed to verify the results, however, the range of temperatures and behavior predicted by FE models are in agreement with similar studies on high speed turning of H13 (Ng et al, 1999;Ng and Aspinwall, 2002a;2002b). Only FE models are able to predict temperatures as the SPH solver utilized in this study is unable to perform coupled temperature displacement analysis.…”
Section:   supporting
confidence: 70%
“…No experiments were performed to verify the results; however, the range of temperatures and behavior predicted by FE models are in agreement with similar studies on high speed turning of H13. 15,34,35 Only FE models are able to predict temperatures as the SPH solver utilized in this study is unable to perform coupled temperature displacement analysis. Figure 15 shows equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) contour at feed rate of 0.25 mm/rev and cutting speed of 250 m/min obtained with FE and SPH models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cutting tool is assumed to be perfectly rigid and isothermal with a temperature set to 294 K. Heat transfer between the particles of the substrate was enabled by applying a heat conductivity coefficient κ = 44.5 W/(mK) for unalloyed steel taken from Ng et al (1999). The work of plastic deformation W p caused by the cutting tool is converted into heat with a Taylor-Quinney-coefficient of 1 as can be seen in Eqn.…”
Section: Heat Transfer In the Substrate And Interaction With The Cuttmentioning
confidence: 99%