1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(97)00237-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of the isothermal melt flow due to rotating magnetic fields in crystal growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the beginning of the activities a rotating magnetic field (RMF) was chosen to generate a forced convection in a cylindrical melt column because for this case a number of theoretical and experimental data about the flow pattern are already available [6][7][8][9][10], although for isothermal conditions, only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginning of the activities a rotating magnetic field (RMF) was chosen to generate a forced convection in a cylindrical melt column because for this case a number of theoretical and experimental data about the flow pattern are already available [6][7][8][9][10], although for isothermal conditions, only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general review of magnetohydrodynamics in materials processing is given by Davidson [52]. Some examples include use of magnetic fields to suppress convection in microgravity Bridgman experiments [53][54][55], to control instability in Czochralski growth [24], and to promote mixing in melt-growth systems [56,57]. A typical model consists of the equations in Table 3.2 with the Lorentz body force included in the momentum balance:…”
Section: Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to thermal sensors, PDPs have been thoroughly employed for the measurement of mean velocities down to their resolution of around 1 mm/s [25,26], and to determine turbulence characteristics of fast flows [27,28]. An advantage of PDPs is the utilization in those cases where a strong magnetic field is intrinsic to the problem.…”
Section: Potential Difference Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%