2003
DOI: 10.1504/pcfd.2003.003770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of the thermal radiation of pool fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences mean that reliable prediction of the processes on which radiation depends at industrial-scale requires experimental data at comparable scale, and cannot rely solely on data at low Reynolds number and/or small physical scale. The optical thickness of a flame also increases with physical scale [1] and the radiative properties of fires become fundamentally different at sufficiently large scale [23].…”
Section: Need For and Challenges To Measurements In Large Scale Flamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These differences mean that reliable prediction of the processes on which radiation depends at industrial-scale requires experimental data at comparable scale, and cannot rely solely on data at low Reynolds number and/or small physical scale. The optical thickness of a flame also increases with physical scale [1] and the radiative properties of fires become fundamentally different at sufficiently large scale [23].…”
Section: Need For and Challenges To Measurements In Large Scale Flamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Droplets have a number of properties that can be exploited in their measurement within reacting environments. Firstly, being spherical allows the exploitation of a range of methodologies that require sphericity, such as phase Doppler particle anemometry, PDPA, and particle sizing from scattering [23]. PDPA is a single point technique that will useful in providing detailed cubic dependence of the f diameter means that it is resolution of both large and That is, avoiding saturation f too low a signal-to-noise ra reliable measurement.…”
Section: Measurements Of Dropletsmentioning
confidence: 99%