2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling optical emission of Ultra-luminous X-ray Sources accreting above the Eddington limit

Abstract: We study the evolution of binary systems of Ultra-luminous X-ray sources and compute their optical emission assuming accretion onto a black hole via a non standard, advection-dominated slim disc with an outflow. We consider systems with black holes of 20M and 100M , and donor masses between 8M and 25M . Super-critical accretion has considerable effects on the optical emission. The irradiating flux in presence of an outflow remains considerably stronger than that produced by a standard disc. However, at very hi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bright optical counterparts with −8 < M V < −4 are not uncommon for ULXs, though these counterparts may have significant contribution to their optical emission from the irradiated accretion disc rather than the companion star (e.g. Grisé et al 2012;Fabrika et al 2015;Ambrosi & Zampieri 2018). We have no evidence that ULX-4 was accreting at the dates of the HST observations (although none of the observations were simultaneous with an X-ray observation so neither can we definitively rule this out).…”
Section: Super-eddington Accreting Sourcementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Bright optical counterparts with −8 < M V < −4 are not uncommon for ULXs, though these counterparts may have significant contribution to their optical emission from the irradiated accretion disc rather than the companion star (e.g. Grisé et al 2012;Fabrika et al 2015;Ambrosi & Zampieri 2018). We have no evidence that ULX-4 was accreting at the dates of the HST observations (although none of the observations were simultaneous with an X-ray observation so neither can we definitively rule this out).…”
Section: Super-eddington Accreting Sourcementioning
confidence: 77%
“…The donor stars in ULXPs obviously do not evolve in isolation, which will impact their evolution tracks (see e.g. Rappaport et al 2005;Patruno & Zampieri 2008, 2010Ambrosi & Zampieri 2018). However, comparing the possible masses and radii of the ULXP donors with those of single stars is useful to show the most plausible evolutionary stage of the donor stars in these systems.…”
Section: Limits On Donor Star Properties From X-ray Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colors and magnitudes of the optical counterparts of ULXs can be significantly affected by irradiation of the donor star and emission from the (supercritical) accretion disc (see e.g. Copperwheat et al 2005Copperwheat et al , 2007Patruno & Zampieri 2008, 2010Ambrosi &Zampieri 2018 for theoretical work, andRoberts et al 2011;Grisé et al 2012 for observations). The theoretical work has so far mostly focused on systems with a (massive) black hole as the accretor, and shows larger effects for more massive black holes; the impact on the optical counterparts of neutron star ULXs may be less pronounced.…”
Section: Contribution From the Accretion Discmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for these systems, the standard irradiation geometry will fail due to occultation by the wind. Irradiation models taking into account the presence of wind and/or a different disk structure under supercritical accretion have been proposed (Vinokurov et al 2013;Ambrosi & Zampieri 2018). These models assume a geometry in which the disk and wind are stacked at characteristic radii.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%