Precision Crop Protection - The Challenge and Use of Heterogeneity 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9277-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Plant Diseases for Decision Making in Crop Protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rossi et al [85] developed a decision support system (DSS) to determine the influence of environmental and agronomic factors (including host species and variety, previous crop, and type of soil tillage before sowing) on Fusarium head blight incidence and mycotoxin risk in small grain cereal; the DSS was validated with an independent dataset. All of these systems are empirical (they were developed based on field data), which results in the following limitations [58]: (i) they provide low detail in describing the pathosystem; (ii) they are difficult to extrapolate to different locations or pathosystems; and (iii) they have structures that cannot be extended with new knowledge. The mechanistic model described here is flexible and can be adapted to specific pathosystems by considering in each case the most important epidemiological components and the most common management actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rossi et al [85] developed a decision support system (DSS) to determine the influence of environmental and agronomic factors (including host species and variety, previous crop, and type of soil tillage before sowing) on Fusarium head blight incidence and mycotoxin risk in small grain cereal; the DSS was validated with an independent dataset. All of these systems are empirical (they were developed based on field data), which results in the following limitations [58]: (i) they provide low detail in describing the pathosystem; (ii) they are difficult to extrapolate to different locations or pathosystems; and (iii) they have structures that cannot be extended with new knowledge. The mechanistic model described here is flexible and can be adapted to specific pathosystems by considering in each case the most important epidemiological components and the most common management actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically measuring the effect of each resistance component on the epidemic development is possible only by performing monocyclic experiments under environmentally controlled experiments, because the overlapping of infection cycles in natural epidemics makes such determinations impossible. For understanding natural epidemics, modelling enables simulation of the effect of each component on epidemiological processes as the epidemic progresses [58][59][60]. In Figure 6A, the model parameters were initially set as in Figure 2 to simulate a susceptible variety and were progressively changed to mimic the single and combined effects of an HR variety, in which p = 8, i = 10, N = 0.6, and I = 0.6.…”
Section: Plant Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the closeness of a predicted value to its ‘true’ value) and robustness (i.e. the capacity of the model to perform equally well across different epidemiological conditions) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed explanation of the mathematics behind the model is out of the scope of the article, but the interested reader can find further information in [43,45,46,47]. …”
Section: Epidemiological Models For Preventing Downy Mildewmentioning
confidence: 99%