2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(99)00915-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling retention in liquid chromatography as a function of solvent composition and pH of the mobile phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
82
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
82
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the low content of methanol in the mobile phase, it was assumed that addition of MeOH to the buffer does not change pH of the hydroorganic mixture substantially. [31][32] From Figure 1 it can be seen that retention of uric acid, guanosine and adenine is markedly affected by pH. At pH 5.5 peaks are quite symmetrical and narrow but the chromatographic resolution (R) was poor, and at pH 4.0 it improves substantially and all bases were separated on the base line (R > 3.6).…”
Section: Optimization Of Chromatographic Conditions For Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low content of methanol in the mobile phase, it was assumed that addition of MeOH to the buffer does not change pH of the hydroorganic mixture substantially. [31][32] From Figure 1 it can be seen that retention of uric acid, guanosine and adenine is markedly affected by pH. At pH 5.5 peaks are quite symmetrical and narrow but the chromatographic resolution (R) was poor, and at pH 4.0 it improves substantially and all bases were separated on the base line (R > 3.6).…”
Section: Optimization Of Chromatographic Conditions For Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches to predict the retention behavior of an ionisable solute as a function of chromatographic conditions. Because of the ionization properties of these types of solutes, the factors generally selected to optimize the chromatographic separation are the pH of the mobile phase and the percentage of the organic solvent of the eluent [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The effect of these parameters on the chromatographic behavior is somewhat more complex since the variation of organic modifier and analyze these compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches to predict the retention behavior of an ionisable solute as a function of chromatographic conditions. Because of the ionization properties of these types of solutes, the factors generally selected to optimize the chromatographic separation are the pH of the mobile phase and the percentage of the organic solvent of the eluent [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The effect of these parameters on the chromatographic behavior is somewhat more complex since the variation of organic modifier concentration of the mobile phase induces a variation of the degree of ionization as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations that relate the retention of a weak acid compound in an LC column with the pH of the mobile phase consider that the retention factor is weighted average of the retention factor of the neutral and ionic forms of the compound according to the molar fractions of these forms in the eluent. A general model using activity coefficient for the influence on ionization on retention of weak acids is indicated below [5,7,10]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%