2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling simultaneous anaerobic methane and ammonium removal in a granular sludge reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, the counter‐diffusional supply of CH 4 and liquid substrates (NO 2 − and NH 4 + ) in the MBfR together with the higher NO 2 − affinity of DAMO bacteria (KNO2Db of 0.01 g N m −3 ) than Anammox bacteria (KNO2An of 0.05 g N m −3 ) led to an abundance of DAMO bacteria relatively comparable with that of Anammox bacteria in the biofilm. In comparison, Winkler et al () reported a competitive advantage of Anammox bacteria over DAMO bacteria in a granular system, which might result from the co‐diffusional supply of substrates (CH 4 , NO 2 − and NH 4 + ) as well as the higher NO 2 − affinity of Anammox bacteria than DAMO bacteria (KNO2An and KNO2Db are 0.1 g N m −3 and 0.6 g N m −3 , respectively) applied in the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this work, the counter‐diffusional supply of CH 4 and liquid substrates (NO 2 − and NH 4 + ) in the MBfR together with the higher NO 2 − affinity of DAMO bacteria (KNO2Db of 0.01 g N m −3 ) than Anammox bacteria (KNO2An of 0.05 g N m −3 ) led to an abundance of DAMO bacteria relatively comparable with that of Anammox bacteria in the biofilm. In comparison, Winkler et al () reported a competitive advantage of Anammox bacteria over DAMO bacteria in a granular system, which might result from the co‐diffusional supply of substrates (CH 4 , NO 2 − and NH 4 + ) as well as the higher NO 2 − affinity of Anammox bacteria than DAMO bacteria (KNO2An and KNO2Db are 0.1 g N m −3 and 0.6 g N m −3 , respectively) applied in the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to the literature, it makes sense that we found UMR mussels enhanced Candidatus Brocadia and suppressed NO 2 − reducing-NC10. Perhaps n-damo organisms did not have a favorable niche in mussel bed sediment because biodeposition products created an excess of NH 4 + in sediment porewater (Winkler et al, 2015), or burrowing activity increased oxygen concentrations and made methane oxidation unfavorable (Van Bodegom et al, 2001). Our finding that no-mussel sediment contained three times more ANME-2d in deeper, and presumably anoxic sediment, further suggests that mussels broaden the oxic–anoxic interface niche (Chen & Gu, 2017; Luesken et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the best fitting in Fig. 5a, the apparent methane affinity coefficient (K CH4 ) of the denitrifying methanotrophs was estimated to be 9.8 Ϯ 2.2 M, which is in the range determined for freshwater denitrifying methanotrophic cultures (3 to 92 M) (29,30). The Monod kinetic equation was also applied to describe the relationship between the denitrifying methanotroph-specific activity and the nitrite concentration (Fig.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%